Article 1: Arts Education

Issues and Topics of Discussion in Arts Education

One of the major issues in arts education is the balance between arts-specific education courses and arts integration. Examples of arts integration are visits from a teaching artist—such as a professional dancer, musician, actor, or visual artist from the community or from an arts organization. Another example of arts integration is when the school music or art teacher collaborates with a classroom teacher to provide learning opportunities in both an art form and at least one other content area such as math, science, history, or language arts.

Arts education would ideally include both arts-specific curriculum and arts integration. Students would learn the specific concepts, skills, and techniques of an art form while also understanding the relationship between that art form and the larger academic content fields.

Arts education—particularly in large urban areas—has been profoundly affected by school partnerships with local arts organizations and artists in the community. Partnerships help schools by offering students access to community performances or artists-in-residence. Field trips to museums and other similar experiences in the artistic and cultural world help inspire students. Ideal arts education partnerships foster collaboration between the community and the school; they also involve parents and families.

Arts educators often discuss the balance between offering arts programs for the especially talented arts student as opposed to arts education for all students. Competitive and selective schools help to identify promising students who may become professional musicians, visual artists, actors, or dancers. General arts education offerings and arts integration programs afford access to all students.

Some schools—again, particularly those in large urban districts—are designated as arts magnet schools or schools of the arts because they have more-extensive programs for students interested in the arts. These schools typically have entrance requirements that include auditions for performers and portfolios of work for visual artists.

Arts education in the United States has been consistently challenged by restrictive funding. The arts were identified as a core subject in the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB; signed into law in 2002). This designation qualified arts instruction for federal grants and other support from both the Department of Education and the NEA (both arms of the federal government). Nevertheless, NCLB currently requires schools to report student achievement test results for only reading and mathematics. There are many reports of decreasing instruction time for such subjects as the arts. Standardized testing at the district and state level has further restricted time spent on the arts; students often use that time to prepare for high-stakes tests.

Article 2: Does Arts Education Matter?

A “Zombie” Idea?

Like the Mozart effect, claims that learning the arts (music, art, theater, or any arts) promote brain development, learning, and academic achievement are often repeated—yet seldom withstand research scrutiny. A team from Harvard University (Hetland & Winner, 2001) performed 10 separate meta-analyses of 188 studies testing the claim that studying the arts promotes academic improvement and came up largely empty-handed. They found: no cause-and-effect link between studying the arts and academic indicators; no link between an arts-rich education and creativity; mixed results for learning music and high mathematics achievement; no significant link between learning music and reading skills; and no convincing link between visual arts and reading achievement.

Nonetheless, claims that the arts promote other forms of learning persist—a zombie idea that keeps coming back to life no matter how often it’s put to rest. So, does that mean arts education isn’t valuable? Not at all. Rather, the persistence of these claims may reflect the fact that we ask arts education to do something we seldom ask of other forms of education: justify itself in light of its effects on other fields. How often do we, for example, ask athletic directors to prove that playing baseball leads to better math skills or improves verbal skills?

Body Paragraph #1 (Reason #1)

A. Topic Sentence (one sentence where you write the first reason that supports your claim/thesis):

___________________________________________________________________________________

B. Evidence (one-two sentences- quote or paraphrase from one of your sources. Remember to include a parenthetical/in-text citation using the parenthetical/in-text citations linked here):

___In the passage says “
_________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

C. Analysis of evidence (one-three sentences- how does your evidence prove the claim?):

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

D. Transition to next paragraph (one sentence, briefly introduce the second reason that supports your claim in the second body paragraph):

___________________________________________________________________________________

Body Paragraph #2 (Reason #2)

A. Topic Sentence (one sentence where you write the second reason that supports your claim/thesis):

___________________________________________________________________________________

B. Evidence (one-two sentences- quote or paraphrase from one of your sources. Remember to include a parenthetical/in-text citation using the parenthetical/in-text citations linked here):

____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

C. Analysis of evidence (one-three sentences- how does your evidence prove the claim?): ____________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________________

D. Transition to next paragraph (one sentence, briefly introduce the counterclaim/rebuttal that you will write in the third body paragraph):

___________________________________________________________________________________

Body Paragraph #3 (Counterclaim/Rebuttal):

A. Address counterclaim (one-two sentences about the opposing viewpoint, “Some people think that…”):

_______________________________________________________________________________

B. Evidence/support for counterclaim (one-three sentences with evidence about the counterclaim. Remember to include a parenthetical/in-text citation using the parenthetical/in-text citations linked here): _________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________

C. Disprove counterclaim (one-three sentences of why the counterclaim is wrong- “However, they are wrong because…”):
__________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

D. Transition to next paragraph (one sentence, briefly transition to the conclusion):

___________________________________________________________________________________

Conclusion

A. Summarize your claim (one-two sentences- reword your claim from your introduction):

__________________________________________________________________________________

B. Summary of reason #1 and reason #2 (two or more sentences that restate what you discussed in your first two body paragraphs): __________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

C. Closing statement/final thought (one sentence that wraps up your paper; what do people need to remember to do?):

Article 1: Arts Education

Issues and Topics of Discussion in Arts Education

One of the major issues in arts education is the balance between arts-specific education courses and arts integration. Examples of arts integration are visits from a teaching artist—such as a professional dancer, musician, actor, or visual artist from the community or from an arts organization. Another example of arts integration is when the school music or art teacher collaborates with a classroom teacher to provide learning opportunities in both an art form and at least one other content area such as math, science, history, or language arts.

Arts education would ideally include both arts-specific curriculum and arts integration. Students would learn the specific concepts, skills, and techniques of an art form while also understanding the relationship between that art form and the larger academic content fields.

Arts education—particularly in large urban areas—has been profoundly affected by school partnerships with local arts organizations and artists in the community. Partnerships help schools by offering students access to community performances or artists-in-residence. Field trips to museums and other similar experiences in the artistic and cultural world help inspire students. Ideal arts education partnerships foster collaboration between the community and the school; they also involve parents and families.

Arts educators often discuss the balance between offering arts programs for the especially talented arts student as opposed to arts education for all students. Competitive and selective schools help to identify promising students who may become professional musicians, visual artists, actors, or dancers. General arts education offerings and arts integration programs afford access to all students.

Some schools—again, particularly those in large urban districts—are designated as arts magnet schools or schools of the arts because they have more-extensive programs for students interested in the arts. These schools typically have entrance requirements that include auditions for performers and portfolios of work for visual artists.

Arts education in the United States has been consistently challenged by restrictive funding. The arts were identified as a core subject in the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB; signed into law in 2002). This designation qualified arts instruction for federal grants and other support from both the Department of Education and the NEA (both arms of the federal government). Nevertheless, NCLB currently requires schools to report student achievement test results for only reading and mathematics. There are many reports of decreasing instruction time for such subjects as the arts. Standardized testing at the district and state level has further restricted time spent on the arts; students often use that time to prepare for high-stakes tests.

Article 2: Does Arts Education Matter?

A “Zombie” Idea?

Like the Mozart effect, claims that learning the arts (music, art, theater, or any arts) promote brain development, learning, and academic achievement are often repeated—yet seldom withstand research scrutiny. A team from Harvard University (Hetland & Winner, 2001) performed 10 separate meta-analyses of 188 studies testing the claim that studying the arts promotes academic improvement and came up largely empty-handed. They found: no cause-and-effect link between studying the arts and academic indicators; no link between an arts-rich education and creativity; mixed results for learning music and high mathematics achievement; no significant link between learning music and reading skills; and no convincing link between visual arts and reading achievement.

Nonetheless, claims that the arts promote other forms of learning persist—a zombie idea that keeps coming back to life no matter how often it’s put to rest. So, does that mean arts education isn’t valuable? Not at all. Rather, the persistence of these claims may reflect the fact that we ask arts education to do something we seldom ask of other forms of education: justify itself in light of its effects on other fields. How often do we, for example, ask athletic directors to prove that playing baseball leads to better math skills or improves verbal skills?

Body Paragraph #1 (Reason #1)

A. Topic Sentence (one sentence where you write the first reason that supports your claim/thesis): Arts education partnerships with local arts organizations and artists in the community can greatly enhance students' experiences and inspire them.

B. Evidence (one-two sentences- quote or paraphrase from one of your sources. Remember to include a parenthetical/in-text citation using the parenthetical/in-text citations linked here): The article states, "Partnerships help schools by offering students access to community performances or artists-in-residence. Field trips to museums and other similar experiences in the artistic and cultural world help inspire students."

C. Analysis of evidence (one-three sentences- how does your evidence prove the claim?): This evidence shows that arts education partnerships provide students with opportunities to engage with professional artists and experience art in the community. This exposure can inspire and enhance their learning experiences in the arts.

D. Transition to next paragraph (one sentence, briefly introduce the second reason that supports your claim in the second body paragraph): Another reason arts education is valuable is that it provides access to all students, regardless of their level of talent or interest in the arts.

Body Paragraph #2 (Reason #2)

A. Topic Sentence (one sentence where you write the second reason that supports your claim/thesis): Arts education offers opportunities for all students, not just the especially talented, to engage in arts learning.

B. Evidence (one-two sentences- quote or paraphrase from one of your sources. Remember to include a parenthetical/in-text citation using the parenthetical/in-text citations linked here): The passage states, "General arts education offerings and arts integration programs afford access to all students."

C. Analysis of evidence (one-three sentences- how does your evidence prove the claim?): This evidence supports the claim that arts education is valuable because it provides opportunities for all students to engage in artistic learning, regardless of their level of talent or interest. It promotes inclusivity and ensures that every student can benefit from the arts.

D. Transition to next paragraph (one sentence, briefly introduce the counterclaim/rebuttal that you will write in the third body paragraph): However, some argue that there is a lack of evidence linking arts education to academic improvement.

Body Paragraph #3 (Counterclaim/Rebuttal):

A. Address counterclaim (one-two sentences about the opposing viewpoint, “Some people think that…”): Some believe that there is no significant link between arts education and academic indicators.

B. Evidence/support for counterclaim (one-three sentences with evidence about the counterclaim. Remember to include a parenthetical/in-text citation using the parenthetical/in-text citations linked here): The article mentions a meta-analysis by a team from Harvard University that found no cause-and-effect link between studying the arts and academic indicators.

C. Disprove counterclaim (one-three sentences of why the counterclaim is wrong- “However, they are wrong because…”): While the meta-analysis found no significant link between arts education and specific academic indicators, it does not negate the overall value of arts education. The counterclaim fails to consider the holistic benefits of arts education, such as creativity, critical thinking, and personal growth. These broader outcomes are essential for a well-rounded education.

D. Transition to next paragraph (one sentence, briefly transition to the conclusion): In conclusion, arts education offers unique benefits that extend beyond academic achievement, making it a valuable part of a comprehensive education.

Conclusion

A. Summarize your claim (one-two sentences- reword your claim from your introduction): Arts education is valuable for students' experiences, inspiration, access, and overall holistic development.

B. Summary of reason #1 and reason #2 (two or more sentences that restate what you discussed in your first two body paragraphs): School partnerships with arts organizations and artists in the community provide valuable experiences and inspiration for students, while general arts education offerings ensure access to all students, regardless of talent or interest.

C. Closing statement/final thought (one sentence that wraps up your paper; what do people need to remember to do?): It is essential to recognize and support the value of arts education in fostering creativity, critical thinking, and personal growth for all students.