Speaking and Listening Apply Discussion
Begin the discussion by responding to the following prompt:
If you know anything about the Titanic, you know it hit an iceberg and sank three hours later. For nearly 24 hours, the world knew only that it was a ship in distress. Most newspapers reported everyone was safe, when in fact, 1,517 passengers and crew perished. Many blamed the new wireless technology, but others thought reporters had fallen for the White Star hype about their “unsinkable” ship.
Analyze the media bias you see in the 1912 article about the Titanic. Discuss the possible reasons that led reporters to believe the White Star hype. Then consider how hype or propaganda may bias reporting today. Give examples if you can.
Post a detailed response to the Media Bias Discussion prompt. Then respond to two classmates' posts.
Click the link below to access the Speaking and Listening Apply Discussion
Mouse icon Speaking and Listening Discussion HOW DID THEY KNOW?
In analyzing the media bias in the 1912 article about the Titanic, it is clear that there was a significant bias towards reporting the positive aspects and downplaying the negative aspects of the situation. This can be seen in the way that most newspapers reported that everyone was safe, despite the fact that over 1,500 people had perished. This bias can be attributed to multiple factors.
One possible reason for this bias is the reliance on official sources, such as the White Star Line, for information about the incident. It is likely that reporters trusted the statements given by the company, which was known for its reputation and status within the industry. The White Star Line had promoted the Titanic as an "unsinkable" ship, and reporters may have fallen for this hype, leading them to believe that everyone had been saved.
Additionally, it is important to consider the influence of sensationalism and the desire for attention-grabbing headlines in the media. The sinking of the Titanic was a major event that captured the world's attention, and newspapers were likely eager to report on it in a way that would generate interest and boost their sales. Reporting that everyone had been saved would have been a more positive and attention-grabbing angle, compared to reporting the tragic loss of life.
Furthermore, there may have been a lack of accurate and timely information available to reporters at the time. Communication technology, such as the wireless telegraph, was still relatively new and may not have been as efficient or reliable as it is today. This could have contributed to the delay in reporting the true extent of the disaster.
Looking at how hype or propaganda may bias reporting today, there are several examples that come to mind. One example is in political reporting, where media outlets may have their own biases and agendas, leading to the promotion of certain views or the demonization of others. This can be seen in the way that news organizations often align themselves with specific political parties or ideologies, resulting in biased reporting.
Another example is in advertising and marketing, where companies may exaggerate the benefits of their products or services in order to attract customers. This can be seen in commercials that make exaggerated claims or selectively present information to make their products seem more appealing.
Social media platforms have also been known to contribute to biased reporting, as they can easily amplify certain perspectives or narratives while suppressing others. This can lead to the spread of misinformation or selective reporting of events.
In conclusion, media bias in the 1912 article about the Titanic can be attributed to factors such as reliance on official sources, sensationalism, and limited access to accurate information. Today, bias in reporting can be seen in various forms, including political reporting, advertising, and the influence of social media. It is important for consumers of media to be critical and discerning in order to seek out multiple perspectives and form well-rounded opinions.