Some historians say that attacks by the abolitionist actually strengthened sectionalism in the South instead of weakening it. How might the abolitionist have been contributing to the tensions arising over slavery? Provide two specific examples of the Southern response to the abolitionist attacks
One way in which abolitionists contributed to tensions arising over slavery was through their propaganda and literature. Abolitionist writings, such as Harriet Beecher Stowe's novel "Uncle Tom's Cabin," portrayed the cruel realities of slavery and aimed to raise awareness among Northerners and challenge the South's defense of slavery. However, these writings further angered and alienated the Southern population, as they felt that their way of life was being attacked and misrepresented.
Another way in which abolitionists contributed to tensions was through their direct actions and involvement in the South. Abolitionist organizations, such as the American Anti-Slavery Society, sent agents and speakers to the South to advocate for an end to slavery. They held public meetings, distributed anti-slavery pamphlets, and organized anti-slavery societies within Southern states. These activities were seen as a threat to the social order and economic stability of the South, as they were aimed at mobilizing slaves and encouraging them to revolt against their masters.
As a response to the abolitionist attacks, the South reacted vehemently in defense of slavery. They argued that slavery was necessary for their economy and way of life. In response to the publication of "Uncle Tom's Cabin," many Southern newspapers denounced the novel as an unfair representation and defended the institution of slavery as a benevolent system. They accused the abolitionists of distorting the truth and spreading misconceptions about slaveholders and slaves.
Furthermore, Southern states enacted laws to suppress abolitionist activities within their borders. One example is the "Gag Rule," implemented in the late 1830s by the U.S. House of Representatives, which ensured that any petitions related to the abolition of slavery were automatically tabled and not discussed. This rule was supported by Southern representatives who wanted to prevent any challenges to the institution of slavery, and it effectively silenced the voice of the abolitionist movement within the federal government.
In both these instances, the Southern response to abolitionist attacks showcased a strong defense of their way of life, which in turn reinforced sectionalism and heightened tensions between the North and the South.