Some historians believe that there were great benefits for enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households. How does this theory compare with other historians’ thoughts?(1 point)
Other historians believe that the benefits were not similar to the benefits free members of a household had.
Other historians believe that great benefits came from owning businesses or selling their own goods.
Other historians believe that enslaved people were treated more like servants.
move up in society.
Other historians believe that being accepted into a poor household could help foreign captives move up in society.
The theory that some historians believe about the benefits of enslaved people becoming a part of Mesopotamian households is not universally agreed upon. Other historians hold different thoughts on this matter. Some historians believe that the benefits for the enslaved people were not comparable to the benefits enjoyed by free members of a household. They argue that even though enslaved people may have had certain advantages within the household context, they were ultimately still subject to the power and control of their owners.
On the other hand, some historians believe that enslaved people in Mesopotamia did experience significant benefits, particularly in the context of economic opportunities. According to this perspective, enslaved individuals were sometimes allowed to own businesses or sell their own goods, which could provide them with some level of autonomy and potential economic advancement.
Another viewpoint suggests that enslaved people in Mesopotamian households were often treated more like servants rather than fully integrated members of the household. They argue that while some limited benefits may have been present, there were still significant power imbalances and limitations on the agency and freedom of the enslaved individuals.
Lastly, some historians argue that being accepted into a poor household in Mesopotamia could offer foreign captives an opportunity to move up in society. In this perspective, the enslaved individuals would have a chance to acquire social capital and potentially improve their position within the society through their association with their household.
Overall, different historians hold diverse opinions regarding the benefits of enslaved individuals becoming part of Mesopotamian households. It is important to consider the various viewpoints and evidence from primary sources in order to form a comprehensive understanding of this complex historical issue.