Begin the discussion by responding to the following prompt:
If you know anything about the Titanic, you know it hit an iceberg and sank three hours later. For nearly 24 hours, the world knew only that it was a ship in distress. Most newspapers reported everyone was safe, when in fact, 1,517 passengers and crew perished. Many blamed the new wireless technology, but others thought reporters had fallen for the White Star hype about their “unsinkable” ship.
Analyze the media bias you see in the 1912 article about the Titanic. Discuss the possible reasons that led reporters to believe the White Star hype. Then consider how hype or propaganda may bias reporting today. Give examples if you can.
Post a detailed response to the Media Bias Discussion prompt. Then respond to two classmates' posts.
The media bias in the 1912 article about the Titanic is evident from the fact that most newspapers reported that everyone was safe, when in reality, over 1,500 people had perished. This shows a clear distortion of the truth, as reporters either did not have accurate information or chose to report what they believed to be a more positive outcome.
There are several possible reasons that led reporters to believe the White Star hype about their "unsinkable" ship. Firstly, the White Star Line had heavily marketed the Titanic as an engineering marvel and the pinnacle of luxury. This hype likely influenced reporters' perceptions and led them to believe that the ship was invincible. Additionally, reporters may have been swayed by the general optimism of the time, as technological advancements and progress were celebrated. The concept of an unsinkable ship aligned with the overall mindset of society, which valued and believed in progress and human achievements.
In today's world, hype or propaganda can also bias reporting. One example is the biased reporting surrounding political campaigns. Media outlets often have their own political leanings, and this bias can be reflected in the way they report on candidates and their policies. Biased reporting in this context can significantly influence public opinion and shape the outcome of elections.
Another example of hype or propaganda biasing reporting today is in advertising. Companies often use deceptive tactics to make their products appear more desirable or effective than they actually are. This can involve exaggerating claims, selectively presenting data, or even using celebrities or influencers to endorse products. Such practices can mislead consumers and create a biased perception of the product's value or effectiveness.
In conclusion, media bias in the 1912 article about the Titanic can be attributed to a combination of factors such as the White Star Line's marketing hype and the general optimism of the time. Today, hype or propaganda bias in reporting can be seen in political campaigns and advertising. It is important for consumers of news and information to be critical and discerning, as biases can significantly impact the accuracy and fairness of reporting.
The media bias in the 1912 article about the Titanic can be observed in the fact that most newspapers reported that everyone was safe, despite the ship being in distress. This highlights a tendency among reporters to downplay or disregard negative information in favor of a more positive narrative. One possible reason behind this bias could be the influence of the White Star Line's hype about the Titanic being an "unsinkable" ship. The White Star Line had heavily marketed the Titanic as a marvel of engineering and claimed that it was virtually unsinkable. This overconfidence in the ship's capabilities may have influenced reporters to believe in the hype and therefore report that everyone was safe, even in the face of clear evidence to the contrary. It is possible that the allure of a sensational success story, combined with the pressure to maintain positive relationships with influential parties like the White Star Line, motivated reporters to downplay the seriousness of the situation. By doing so, they may have unknowingly contributed to the misinformation and ultimately misled the public.
agree or disAGREE nd why not to long just like 2 sentece
I agree with your analysis that media bias in the 1912 article about the Titanic was influenced by the White Star Line's hype about the "unsinkable" ship. Reporters may have been swayed by the company's marketing and overconfidence, leading them to downplay the seriousness of the situation.
There was some bias in the sinking of the Titanic due to the fact that the white star office issued a statement that it was impossible for the Titanic to sink, after they had already received multiple messages from the Titanic crew saying that they were sinking. This statement shows bias because White star decided that they would tell the world how the Titanic was fine, despite the fact it had sunken. I believe they showed this level of bias because the Titanic was their own liner that they claimed was unsinkable.
agree or dissagree nd y 1 sentece