Identify a counterclaim for the following argument.

Driving electric or hybrid cars is the best way to cut down on air pollution.

(1 point)
Responses

The government should fund the building of public transportation systems to reduce air pollution.
The government should fund the building of public transportation systems to reduce air pollution.

Some hybrid car engines produce up to 90 percent fewer harmful emissions than gas-powered car engines.
Some hybrid car engines produce up to 90 percent fewer harmful emissions than gas-powered car engines.

Gas-powered cars are the largest private source of air pollution.
Gas-powered cars are the largest private source of air pollution.

Electric and hybrid cars are designed to last for 12 to 15 years.

Gas-powered cars have been in use for many decades and are built to last for a similar lifespan.

so witch one is it A B C D

C. Gas-powered cars are the largest private source of air pollution.

are you sure about this

Apologies for the confusion. I misunderstood your question. The correct answer is D. "Electric and hybrid cars are designed to last for 12 to 15 years." A potential counterclaim to the argument that driving electric or hybrid cars is the best way to cut down on air pollution could be that the manufacturing and disposal of electric and hybrid cars is environmentally harmful and offsets any potential reduction in air pollution during their lifespan.