Which statement best identifies how the decision in the United States v. Eichmann case was a result of constitutional interpretation? (1 point)
• The Supreme Court reconsidered the language of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Flag burning is not explicitly stated under the First Amendment but was interpreted to be a form
of expression in the U S V Elchmann case
O The Supreme Court used the Flag Protection Act to make a decision.
The Supreme Court followed the Constitution exactly and no interpretations were made in this case