Peer critique
Remember 1 glow and 1 grow for each presenter
You'll need to croute a total of 4 people
Presenter 1:
Glow: I really appreciated how confident and clear Presenter 1 was throughout their presentation. They appeared well-prepared and knowledgeable about the topic. They used visuals effectively, making it easier to follow along with their points. Overall, their communication skills were excellent.
Grow: One area for improvement for Presenter 1 could be their pacing. At times, they seemed to rush through some parts of the presentation, making it a little difficult to fully absorb the information. Slowing down a bit and allowing for some pauses could greatly enhance the overall delivery.
Presenter 2:
Glow: Presenter 2 had a strong presence and engaged the audience effectively. Their enthusiasm for the topic was contagious and created a positive atmosphere. They also incorporated real-life examples and anecdotes, making the content more relatable. It was evident that they had done thorough research on the subject.
Grow: One area where Presenter 2 could improve is in their use of visual aids. While they had some visuals, they were not as impactful or well-integrated into the presentation. Investing more time in creating visually appealing and relevant visuals would enhance the overall impact of their presentation.
Presenter 3:
Glow: Presenter 3 demonstrated excellent presentation skills, including clear and articulate communication. They had a well-organized structure and stayed on topic, making it easy to follow along. The use of storytelling and personal experiences added depth to their presentation. They had a strong connection with the audience.
Grow: One suggestion for Presenter 3 would be to incorporate more audience interaction in their presentation. While they engaged the audience with their stories, involving the audience in shorter activities or asking questions could further enhance engagement and create a more dynamic experience.
Presenter 4:
Glow: Presenter 4 had a strong command of the information and a confident delivery. They effectively used visuals to support their points and help the audience grasp complex concepts. Their presentation had a logical flow, making it easy to understand the progression of ideas. They were also responsive to questions and handled them well.
Grow: One area for improvement for Presenter 4 could be to vary their voice tone and inflection. While they were confident and clear in their presentation, adding more variation in their voice could help to keep the audience engaged and maintain interest throughout the presentation.
Overall, each presenter had their strengths and areas for further growth. Incorporating these glows and grows can lead to even more impactful and engaging presentations in the future.