Write a paragraph in which you describe the steps that experienced readers can use to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. Provide specific examples from the two texts. "Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World" by Yonathan Zohar, and "Say No to Genetically Modified Salmon" by Rick Moonen.
Experienced readers can employ a systematic approach to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. First, they should identify the main arguments presented in both texts. In Yonathan Zohar's article, "Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World," he supports the idea that genetically modified (GM) salmon holds the potential to address global food scarcity. He argues that GM salmon can be engineered to grow faster, increase yields, and utilize less resources. Conversely, Rick Moonen's article, "Say No to Genetically Modified Salmon," opposes the idea of GM salmon. Moonen claims that introducing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) into ecosystems poses serious risks and rejects the notion that GM salmon is a sustainable solution. Second, experienced readers should evaluate the credibility and expertise of the authors, considering their credentials and biases. Zohar is a professor in aquaculture and is likely to possess extensive knowledge in the subject matter, while Moonen is a respected chef with concerns about the impact of GMOs on his profession. Finally, they should compare the evidence and supporting details provided in both texts, assessing the validity and reliability of the sources used. By examining these steps, experienced readers can navigate the conflicting information presented in these two texts and form a well-informed and balanced understanding of the controversy surrounding genetically modified salmon.
