Why did some groups in South America continue to live as nomads after the development of agriculture?
They lived in ecosystems that were not suitable for farming.
They had no way of learning how to domesticate crops.
They had more than enough wild plants and animals to thrive on.
They believed that agriculture was bad for the land.
There can be various reasons why some groups in South America continued to live as nomads after the development of agriculture. One possible reason is that they lived in ecosystems that were not suitable for farming. Certain regions might have had environmental conditions, such as extremely arid or mountainous areas, making agriculture challenging or unproductive.
Another reason could be that these groups had no way of learning how to domesticate crops. The knowledge and skills required for agriculture may not have been accessible to them, potentially due to limited contact with settled agricultural communities or lack of cultural exchange.
Additionally, they might have had abundant wild plants and animals available in their environment, which allowed them to thrive through hunting, gathering, or fishing without the need for farming. If their livelihoods were already secure through these means, they might not have felt the necessity to transition to agriculture.
Lastly, it is possible that some groups viewed agriculture as detrimental to the land or had cultural beliefs or traditions that discouraged or opposed its practice. They might have held beliefs regarding the sustainability of hunting and gathering and saw agriculture as a harmful alteration of the natural environment.
It is important to note that the specific reasons varied among different indigenous groups in South America, and multiple factors could have contributed to their decision to continue a nomadic lifestyle despite the development of agriculture.