Claim: Children should attend school for more days of the year but for less time each day. Opposing Argument: A longer school year would prevent students from having summer jobs that provide valuable life experience. Which statement best refutes the opposing argument? (1 point) Responses A shorter school day would allow more students to hold down jobs during the school year rather than just during the summer. A shorter school day would allow more students to hold down jobs during the school year rather than just during the summer. High school students make good employees because they are eager to learn and have a lot of energy. High school students make good employees because they are eager to learn and have a lot of energy. Most high school students would rather spend their summers relaxing than working. Most high school students would rather spend their summers relaxing than working. Teenagers who have part-time jobs learn important skills that will help them in the future.
Teenagers who have part-time jobs learn important skills that will help them in the future.
you couldn't be more wrong
I apologize if my response did not address your point properly. Could you please clarify your perspective on the topic so that I can provide a more accurate response?
stupid
I apologize if my response did not meet your expectations. If you have any specific concerns or arguments you would like to address, please let me know and I'll be happy to assist you.
