Why was the Twenty-fifth Amendment necessary?(1 point) Responses Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, there was no term limit so the amendment was necessary to limit a presidential monopoly. Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, there was no term limit so the amendment was necessary to limit a presidential monopoly. Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, there was no written regulation stating the vice president would retain office if the president perished or was removed from office. Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, there was no written regulation stating the vice president would retain office if the president perished or was removed from office. Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, the lame duck period was too long. Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, the lame duck period was too long. Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, Congress had no way of impeaching or removing the president if they were unfit to retain power. Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, Congress had no way of impeaching or removing the president if they were unfit to retain power.

All of the above reasons contributed to the necessity of the Twenty-fifth Amendment.