Why was the Twenty-fifth Amendment necessary?(1 point)
Responses
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, Congress had no way of impeaching or removing the president if they were unfit to retain power.
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, Congress had no way of impeaching or removing the president if they were unfit to retain power.
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, the lame duck period was too long.
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, the lame duck period was too long.
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, there was no written regulation stating the vice president would retain office if the president perished or was removed from office.
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, there was no written regulation stating the vice president would retain office if the president perished or was removed from office.
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, there was no term limit so the amendment was necessary to limit a presidential monopoly.
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, there was no term limit so the amendment was necessary to limit a presidential monopoly.
All of the above statements are correct reasons why the Twenty-fifth Amendment was necessary.
Why was the Twenty-fifth Amendment necessary?(1 point)
Responses
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, Congress had no way of impeaching or removing the president if they were unfit to retain power.
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, the lame duck period was too long.
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, there was no written regulation stating the vice president would retain office if the president perished or was removed from office.
Prior to the Twenty-fifth Amendment, there was no term limit so the amendment was necessary to limit a presidential monopoly.