would you describe this series of transformations?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0ASince triangles ABC and A′′B"C" do not have the same orientation, they are not congruent.%0D%0ASince triangles upper A upper B upper C and upper A double prime upper B double prime upper C double prime do not have the same orientation, they are not congruent.%0D%0A%0D%0ARotation of 90 degrees clockwise and then reflection across the x-axis shows that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle A′′B"C".%0D%0ARotation of 90 degrees clockwise and then reflection across the x -axis shows that triangle upper A upper B upper C is congruent to triangle upper A double prime upper B double prime upper C double prime .%0D%0A%0D%0ATranslation of (2,0) and then reflection across the x-axis shows that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle A′′B"C".%0D%0ATranslation of left parenthesis 2 comma 0 right parenthesis and then reflection across the x -axis shows that triangle upper A upper B upper C is congruent to triangle upper A double prime upper B double prime upper C double prime .%0D%0A%0D%0AReflection across the y-axis and then a translation of (−3,−5) shows that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle A′′B"C".
The series of transformations described is a rotation of 90 degrees clockwise followed by a reflection across the x-axis. These transformations show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle A′′B"C".
