How would you describe this series of transformations?(1 point)

Responses

Translation of (2,0) and then reflection across the x-axis shows that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle A′′B"C".
Translation of left parenthesis 2 comma 0 right parenthesis and then reflection across the x -axis shows that triangle upper A upper B upper C is congruent to triangle upper A double prime upper B double prime upper C double prime .

Reflection across the y-axis and then a translation of (−3,−5) shows that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle A′′B"C".
Reflection across the y -axis and then a translation of left parenthesis negative 3 comma negative 5 right parenthesis shows that triangle upper A upper B upper C is congruent to triangle upper A double prime upper B double prime upper C double prime .

Rotation of 90 degrees clockwise and then reflection across the x-axis shows that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle A′′B"C".
Rotation of 90 degrees clockwise and then reflection across the x -axis shows that triangle upper A upper B upper C is congruent to triangle upper A double prime upper B double prime upper C double prime .

Since triangles ABC and A′′B"C" do not have the same orientation, they are not congruent.
Since triangles upper A upper B upper C and upper A double prime upper B double prime upper C double prime do not have the same orientation, they are not congruent.
Skip to navigation

The correct response is:


Translation of (2,0) and then reflection across the x-axis shows that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle A′′B"C".

The series of transformations described is a translation followed by a reflection. The translation is given by (2,0) or left parenthesis 2 comma 0 right parenthesis. This means that the triangle ABC is moved 2 units to the right and 0 units up. The reflection is across the x-axis, which means the triangle is flipped upside down. This series of transformations shows that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle A''B"C".