Being present at the discussion in participatory forum is not the same as initiating the discussion or having control over it. Discuss with reasons.
Being present at a discussion in a participatory forum is different from initiating the discussion or having control over it for several reasons:
1. Initiation is based on personal choice: When we initiate a discussion, we have control over the topic, timing, and direction of the conversation. It is a proactive decision to put forth a particular subject or issue for discussion. On the other hand, being present at an ongoing discussion implies that someone else has initiated the conversation and others are joining in to participate.
2. Control over the agenda: Initiating a discussion grants the individual control over the agenda. They can shape the topics, select the participants, and set the rules. This level of control enables them to drive the conversation according to their intentions. However, simply being present in a participatory forum means that the individual has limited or no control over the agenda. They are bound by the pre-existing topic or theme established by the initiator.
3. Influence on the flow of conversation: By initiating a discussion, one has the power to guide the flow of conversation and shape it according to their preferences. They can introduce new perspectives, moderate the discussion, and ensure relevant points are addressed. Conversely, being present at a discussion in a participatory forum does not grant the same level of influence. While participants can contribute their thoughts and ideas, they do not have control over the overall direction of the conversation.
4. Responsibility for maintaining order: Initiators of discussions often bear the responsibility of maintaining order and ensuring respectful communication among participants. They can enforce rules, moderate conflicts, and establish a conducive environment for productive dialogue. However, those who are simply present at a participatory forum have limited or no authority in maintaining order within the discussion.
5. Role in decision-making: Initiation of a discussion often implies a position of authority or responsibility in the decision-making process. The initiator may seek input from others, but ultimately they hold the power to make decisions based on the outcomes of the conversation. Conversely, those who are just present in a participatory forum may not necessarily have decision-making authority and might only share their opinions without the ability to directly impact the final outcome.
In conclusion, being present at a discussion in a participatory forum differs significantly from initiating the discussion or having control over it. Initiators have the freedom to influence the agenda, shape the conversation, and maintain order, while participants in a forum have limited control over these aspects and may contribute within the framework established by the initiator.