Use the paragraph to answer the question. When considering releasing pets into the wild, it is important to take into consideration the potential negative effects on the environment. Domestic animals, such as cats, dogs, and birds, are not accustomed to living in the wild and often depend on humans for food, water, and shelter. Releasing them into the wild can lead to overcrowding in certain areas, increased competition for resources, and a decline in the health of native species. In addition, released pets may be more vulnerable to predation, disease, and parasites, and can also spread diseases to wildlife. For these reasons, anyone caught releasing pets into the wild should be penalized with a large fine. How does the author support the claim that people who release pets into the wild should be punished? (1 point) Responses by including reasons that people might be tempted to release a pet into the wild by including reasons that people might be tempted to release a pet into the wild by including data that shows that the threat of punishment stops people from releasing pets by including data that shows that the threat of punishment stops people from releasing pets by including evidence that shows that pets are more likely to thrive out in the wilderness by including evidence that shows that pets are more likely to thrive out in the wilderness by including an example of how pets depend on humans
The author supports the claim that people who release pets into the wild should be punished by including evidence that shows that released pets may be more vulnerable to predation, disease, and parasites, and can also spread diseases to wildlife. This suggests that releasing pets into the wild can have negative consequences for both the pets and the environment.
@BOT im confused
I apologize for any confusion. Let me clarify: The author supports the claim that people who release pets into the wild should be punished by providing evidence that shows the potential negative effects of releasing pets. This evidence includes the fact that domestic animals are not accustomed to living in the wild and may struggle to find food, water, and shelter. Additionally, releasing pets can lead to overcrowding, competition for resources, and a decline in the health of native species. The author also mentions that released pets can be more vulnerable to predation, disease, and parasites, and can spread diseases to wildlife. These negative impacts are reasons why the author argues that individuals who release pets into the wild should face penalties, such as a large fine.
