are use the paragraph to answer the question.
facing seen a native animals into the wild of such the food change of native species. the tegu wizard has been introduced into the Florida everglades and is destroying the environment. Decision to eat anything that crosses his path, including small mammals, birds, insects, plants come And eggs, leaving animal of this ecosystem in danger. If all parts of the environment are on the tegus menu commas in all animals in the habitat are at rest of extension. for this reason, anyone caught releasing all native animals into the world should be penalized what’s a scientific fine
how does the author supports the claim that people who release native animals into the wall should be punished?
-By including an example of a non-native animals that has caused problems in the new environment
-by including reasons that people might be tempted to take an animal out as it native environment
-by including evidence that shows the animals are more likely to thrive in their native environment
-Bring including data that shows stretch of punishment stops people from leasing on native animals into the wild
By including an example of a non-native animal, the tegu lizard, causing destruction in the Florida Everglades, the author supports the claim that people who release native animals into the wild should be punished. This example demonstrates the negative consequences of introducing non-native species into new environments. It effectively shows that such actions can have detrimental effects on the ecosystem and therefore concludes that those responsible should face penalties.
The author supports the claim that people who release native animals into the wild should be punished by including an example of a non-native animal that has caused problems in the new environment. In this case, the introduction of the tegu lizard into the Florida everglades is mentioned as destroying the environment. This example serves to illustrate the potential dangers of releasing non-native species into a new habitat.
However, the paragraph does not include reasons that people might be tempted to take an animal out of its native environment, evidence showing that animals are more likely to thrive in their native environment, or data showing that punishment deters people from releasing native animals into the wild.
The author supports the claim that people who release native animals into the wild should be punished by including an example of a non-native animal that has caused problems in the new environment. In this case, the example given is the tegu lizard that has been introduced into the Florida Everglades and is destroying the environment by eating anything that crosses its path. This example serves to illustrate the negative impacts that can be caused by non-native species when they are released into a new habitat.
The author does not directly mention reasons why people might be tempted to take an animal out of its native environment. Similarly, the author does not provide evidence that shows that the animals are more likely to thrive in their native environment. Additionally, there is no specific mention of data showing that punishment prevents people from releasing native animals into the wild.
Therefore, the correct answer would be: by including an example of a non-native animal that has caused problems in the new environment.