Questions LLC
Login
or
Sign Up
Ask a New Question
Law
Evidence
Admissibility
To be admissible, evidence of prior acts must be relevant to what?
Proper purpose
Lawyers
Judges
Evidence
1 answer
Evidence of prior acts must be relevant to the case or issue at hand.
You can
ask a new question
or
answer this question
.
Related Questions
Which term describes the use of enough information to support a claim?(1 point)
Responses sufficient evidence sufficient evidence
A committee of five people is to be formed from six lawyers and seven teachers. Find the probability that none are lawyers.
Which term describes the use of enough information to support a claim?(1 point)
Responses sufficient evidence sufficient evidence
Which of the following is an argument in support of the popular election of state judges?
It allows the judges to be more
Using Relevant Details Quick Check
5 of 55 of 5 Items Question Which purpose does a relevant detail serve?(1 point) Responses It
Which term describes the use of enough information to support a claim?(1 point) Responses important evidence important evidence
Which purpose does a relevant detail serve?
1. It evaluates facts and evidence 2. It identifies ideas not related to the topic 3.
Which purpose does a relevant detail serve?(1 point)
Responses It identifies ideas not related to the topic. It evaluates facts
What are the main purposes of the Supreme Court’s written majority opinions? Select the two correct answers.
a. to rewrite
Sufficiency of Evidence Quick Check
2 of 32 of 3 Items Question Evidence is relevant if it(1 point) Responses provides enough
