The reasoning given to support the claim is somewhat sound. It is true that studies show that higher fines can result in less speeding, write like a 8th graderwhich could potentially improve safety. However, the argument does not take into account potential effects on lower-income individuals who may struggle to pay the higher fine. Additionally, it assumes that everyone who can afford a $50 fine can also afford a $100 fine, which may not be accurate. Therefore, while the reasoning has some merit, it is not entirely sound.
Like, the people who say this claim kinda have a point. Some studies do show that if fines for speeding are higher, then maybe fewer people will speed, which might make things safer on the road. But, they don't think about how this could affect people who don't have a lot of money. Some people might really struggle to pay a bigger fine, and it's not fair to punish them too hard for a mistake. Plus, they assume that everyone who can pay a $50 fine can also pay a $100 fine, which might not be true for some people. So, while there's a little bit of sense in the reasoning, it's not completely true.
