Analyze the case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did? Choose the BEST answer.
A: Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent
B: Miranda was not warned of his right to a phone call
C: Miranda was not warned of his right to cross-examine witnesses
D: Miranda was not warned of his right to the takings clause
The most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in the case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) is:
A: Miranda was not warned of his right to remain silent.