Which of the following best predicts what could have happened if Article X had not been removed from the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo?(1 point) Responses Indigenous groups would have been able to keep their land. Indigenous groups would have been able to keep their land. Tejanos living in Texas would have been able to keep their land. Tejanos living in Texas would have been able to keep their land. Anglos living in Texas would have been able to keep their land. Anglos living in Texas would have been able to keep their land. Mexicans living in Texas would have been able to keep their land.
If Article X had not been removed from the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, the best prediction would be that Mexicans living in Texas would have been able to keep their land.
whats the answer?
The answer is: Mexicans living in Texas would have been able to keep their land.
To determine what could have happened if Article X had not been removed from the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, we need to understand the content of Article X itself. Article X was a provision in the treaty that guaranteed Mexican citizens living in the territories annexed by the United States, including Texas, the protection of their property rights. However, this provision was ultimately removed from the final version of the treaty.
Based on this information, we can deduce that if Article X had not been removed from the treaty, the most likely outcome would have been that Mexicans living in Texas would have been able to keep their land. This is because Article X specifically protected the property rights of Mexican citizens in the annexed territories.
Therefore, among the given options, the best prediction of what could have happened if Article X had not been removed is that Mexicans living in Texas would have been able to keep their land.