Which statement predicts what would have happened if Antonio de San Buenaventura y Olivares had decided to start building a mission in 1709?(1 point)
Responses
He would have been accepted by the Tejas, and the mission would have succeeded.
He would have been accepted by the Tejas, and the mission would have succeeded.
He would have been accepted by the Tejas, but the mission would have failed.
He would have been accepted by the Tejas, but the mission would have failed.
He would have met with resistance from the Tejas, and the mission would have failed.
He would have met with resistance from the Tejas, and the mission would have failed.
He would have met with resistance from the Tejas, but the mission would have succeeded.
The correct response is "He would have been accepted by the Tejas, but the mission would have failed."
To predict what would have happened if Antonio de San Buenaventura y Olivares had decided to start building a mission in 1709, we need to examine the historical context and the possible outcomes based on that context.
1. He would have been accepted by the Tejas, and the mission would have succeeded.
To determine if this statement is likely to be true, we would need to consider factors such as the relationship between San Buenaventura y Olivares and the Tejas people at that time, as well as the prevailing conditions in the region. If there was a positive relationship between San Buenaventura y Olivares and the Tejas, and if the conditions were favorable for the success of a mission, then this statement might be true.
2. He would have been accepted by the Tejas, but the mission would have failed.
Again, to evaluate this statement, we need to consider the historical context. If there was a positive relationship between San Buenaventura y Olivares and the Tejas, but other factors such as external threats, lack of resources, or internal challenges within the mission hindered its success, then this statement might be true.
3. He would have met with resistance from the Tejas, and the mission would have failed.
To determine the likelihood of this statement, we need to examine the historical relationship between San Buenaventura y Olivares and the Tejas. If there were conflicts or tensions between them, or if the Tejas opposed the establishment of a mission, then it is possible that this statement is true.
4. He would have met with resistance from the Tejas, but the mission would have succeeded.
Similar to the previous statements, we would need to consider the historical context. If there were initial resistance from the Tejas, but San Buenaventura y Olivares was able to overcome it and establish a successful mission through diplomacy, negotiation, or other means, then this statement might be true.
In conclusion, without further information about the specific circumstances, it is difficult to determine which statement accurately predicts what would have happened if Antonio de San Buenaventura y Olivares had decided to start building a mission in 1709. Historical analysis and information about the relationship between San Buenaventura y Olivares and the Tejas people would be necessary to make an informed prediction.