According to the Lemon Test, which of the following would be legal?
A private religious school uses public funds to hire a religion teacher.
A public high school requires students to stand for the prayer before a football game.
A private religious school uses public funds to hire a cafeteria worker.
A public high school forbids teachers from purchasing lottery tickets.
According to the Lemon Test, the following would be legal:
- A private religious school uses public funds to hire a cafeteria worker.
- A public high school forbids teachers from purchasing lottery tickets.
The Lemon Test, derived from the case Lemon v. Kurtzman, is a three-part test used by the Supreme Court to determine whether a law or action violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. According to the test, a law or action must have a secular purpose, must not primarily advance or inhibit a religion, and must not create excessive entanglement between the government and religion.
In the given options, the private religious school using public funds to hire a religion teacher and the public high school requiring students to stand for prayer before a football game would likely be deemed unconstitutional under the Lemon Test. These actions would violate the second prong of the test, as they primarily advance or endorse a specific religion.
Which of the following would be an exception to the right to peacefully assemble?
A group of union members goes on strike against a public utility company.
A political interest group holds a meeting in a private home.
A group of Nazis march through a mostly Jewish neighborhood.
A group of people protesting increased fees block the entrance to a bank.
The exception to the right to peacefully assemble would be:
A group of Nazis marching through a mostly Jewish neighborhood.
While the right to peacefully assemble is protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, there are certain exceptions and limitations imposed for public safety and order. One such exception is when the assembly incites violence, poses a clear and present danger, or threatens public safety. In the given options, the group of Nazis marching through a mostly Jewish neighborhood could potentially incite violence or create a hostile environment, making it an exception to the right to peacefully assemble.
Why would the Supreme Court rule, as they did in Engel v. Vitale, that a public school district cannot compose a school prayer to begin the school day?
Public schools are government institutions and cannot establish religious practices.
Students are citizens and should not be forced to do things they don’t agree with.
It would take away parents’ rights to practice a different religion at home.
Taxpayers should agree before being asked to fund religious activities in public schools.
The reason the Supreme Court ruled, as they did in Engel v. Vitale, that a public school district cannot compose a school prayer to begin the school day is because public schools are government institutions and cannot establish religious practices.
The ruling in Engel v. Vitale was based on the principle of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from favoring one religion over others or from endorsing religion in general. The Court concluded that a school-composed prayer recited in public schools would violate this principle by endorsing and promoting religion. Therefore, the Court determined that public schools should not have the authority to compose and mandate a prayer as part of the school day.
The other options mentioned (students not being forced to do things they don’t agree with, taking away parents' rights to practice a different religion at home, and taxpayers having a say in funding religious activities) are not the primary reasons for the Court's ruling in Engel v. Vitale. The ruling was primarily based on the constitutional principle of separation of church and state and maintaining the neutrality of public institutions in matters of religion.
witch is the anser
The answer is:
Public schools are government institutions and cannot establish religious practices.