In 3–5 sentences, compare the causes and effects of constitutional monarchy in England with the causes and effects of absolute monarchy in Russia. from the text below
pleas
Peter the Great At the time of Peter I’s (or Peter the Great’s) birth in 1672, Russia was not a nation that seemed ripe for absolute rule. The Russian language did not yet have a word for monarchy or government—just the title of its ruler, tsar, which was itself adapted from the Latin word caesar. The government as it existed was feudal and followed unwritten rules. The boyar class made up of aristocratic and landowning Russians, ruled along with the tsar for centuries. All shared power over Russia’s huge territory, which included people of many ethnicities. Power struggles among the boyars meant that, although a 10-year-old Peter was technically made co-tsar with his half-brother in 1682, like Louis XIV he did not become a true ruler until later in his life. However, Peter’s path to ruling was more difficult than announcing that he would now take absolute power. He had to wait until a revolt in the army gave him an opportunity to remove his half-brother's family from power. Even then, it was many years until he could reasonably be called an absolute ruler. Peter built his power by military success, force of personality, and sheer will. Russia before Peter was extremely isolated from the rest of Europe. In fact, once a French king sent a letter to a tsar who had died 12 years previously. Peter made his reputation and brought Russia into the consciousness of Europe by achieving military success against the Ottoman Turks. He did this while expanding the Russian Empire
The causes of constitutional monarchy in England were primarily political and religious in nature. The English Civil War, which lasted from 1642 to 1651, resulted in the overthrow of King Charles I and the establishment of a republican government. However, the Restoration of the monarchy in 1660 led to the adoption of a constitutional monarchy, which limited the powers of the monarch and granted certain rights and freedoms to Parliament. The effects of constitutional monarchy in England included a more stable and balanced government, with checks and balances on the power of the monarch, the establishment of individual rights and liberties, and a gradual shift towards a more democratic system.
On the other hand, the causes of absolute monarchy in Russia were primarily related to the country's historical and social context. Russia was a vast and diverse empire, with different ethnic groups and a complex social hierarchy. The Russian monarchy, ruled by the tsars, claimed absolute power and control over the entire empire. This was justified through the concept of the "divine right of kings," which held that the tsar was chosen by God and had unlimited authority. The effects of absolute monarchy in Russia included a highly centralized and autocratic government, limited political rights and freedoms for the general population, and a lack of checks and balances on the power of the tsar. This system ultimately led to social unrest and the eventual downfall of the monarchy during the Russian Revolution in 1917.