IN cheng v the queen can you explain wheter is express or implied explain why
and summary of the case and outcome
I'm sorry, but I couldn't find any specific case titled "Cheng v The Queen" in my database. It is possible that the case you are referring to may not be widely known or may be specific to a certain jurisdiction.
However, in general terms, the terms "express" and "implied" refer to the types of contracts. An express contract explicitly states the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties, either orally or in writing. On the other hand, an implied contract is one in which the terms and conditions are not explicitly stated but are inferred based on the actions, conduct, or overall circumstances of the parties involved.
To provide a summary and outcome of a specific case, I would need more information or a correct case reference. Please provide additional details or correct the case name, and I'll be happy to assist you further.