Which of the following best explains why the influence of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights has lessened in recent decades?(1 point)
Responses
Many countries have tried democracy but found it did not work for them, causing them to give up on the American model.
Many countries have tried democracy but found it did not work for them, causing them to give up on the American model.
The practices of separation of powers, checks and balances, and judicial review are no longer seen as useful.
The practices of separation of powers, checks and balances, and judicial review are no longer seen as useful.
The U.S. Bill of Rights, while revolutionary when it was written, increasingly seems too limited in comparison to newer rights documents.
The U.S. Bill of Rights, while revolutionary when it was written, increasingly seems too limited in comparison to newer rights documents.
People no longer want to use the U.S. Constitution because so many countries were not successful in keeping the constitutions they developed.
To determine which of the given options best explains why the influence of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights has lessened in recent decades, we can analyze each option:
1. Many countries have tried democracy but found it did not work for them, causing them to give up on the American model.
This option suggests that other countries have given up on the American model of democracy, leading to a reduction in the influence of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. However, it does not directly address the specific reasons for the decrease in influence.
2. The practices of separation of powers, checks and balances, and judicial review are no longer seen as useful.
This option suggests that the core principles of the U.S. Constitution, such as separation of powers, checks and balances, and judicial review, are no longer perceived as useful. If this were the case, it could contribute to a decline in the influence of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
3. The U.S. Bill of Rights, while revolutionary when it was written, increasingly seems too limited in comparison to newer rights documents.
This option indicates that newer rights documents may be seen as more comprehensive or better suited to address contemporary circumstances compared to the U.S. Bill of Rights. If this perception exists, it could lead to a diminished influence of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
4. People no longer want to use the U.S. Constitution because so many countries were not successful in keeping the constitutions they developed.
This option suggests that people have lost interest in using the U.S. Constitution because many countries have failed to maintain the constitutions they developed. While this may contribute to a perception of reduced influence, it does not directly address the specific reasons behind the decline.
Based on these considerations, option 2, which suggests that the practices of separation of powers, checks and balances, and judicial review are no longer seen as useful, seems to be the most reasonable and directly related explanation for the reduced influence of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights in recent decades.