Which statement is an example of reasoning in Section #2? (HINT: Consider which statement is an opinion and not factual.)(1 point)

Responses

Conservationists have already had success returning living species to areas where they've died out.
Conservationists have already had success returning living species to areas where they've died out.

Their extermination a century ago led to environmental problems, such as the decline of certain trees.
Their extermination a century ago led to environmental problems, such as the decline of certain trees.

But just 20 years after conservationists returned wolves to Yellowstone, the ecosystem is much healthier.
But just 20 years after conservationists returned wolves to Yellowstone, the ecosystem is much healthier.

We need to focus on bringing back those critical species that will help other living species.

We need to focus on bringing back those critical species that will help other living species.

This statement is an example of reasoning in Section #2 because it presents an opinion about what actions should be prioritized in conservation efforts.

by sharing the example of wolves in Yellowstone National Park

Ben J. Novak mostly supports his claim that reviving extinct animals is beneficial by sharing the example of wolves in Yellowstone National Park. This example illustrates how the reintroduction of a species can have positive effects on the ecosystem.

How does Ben J. Novak mostly support his claim that reviving extinct animals is beneficial?(1 point)

Responses

by referencing a famous movie
by referencing a famous movie

by sharing the example of wolves in Yellowstone National Park
by sharing the example of wolves in Yellowstone National Park

by explaining that dinosaurs cannot be brought back
by explaining that dinosaurs cannot be brought back

by defining "conservation work"

The statement "We need to focus on bringing back those critical species that will help other living species" is an example of reasoning in Section #2. This statement expresses an opinion about the importance of focusing on critical species that benefit other living species. To determine the answer, you had to identify a statement that is subjective rather than factual.