Using context clues and your knowledge of word parts, what is the best definition for "salvageable" in the first paragraph of section #2? (1 point) Responses able to be saved able to be saved saved before saved before the state of being saved the state of being saved without being saved
The best definition for "salvageable" in the first paragraph of section #2 is "able to be saved".
is this correct
Yes, that is correct. "Salvageable" means able to be saved.
What is the author's main claim in the first paragraph of section #2?(1 point) Responses We should not revive extinct species because it is threatening. We should not revive extinct species because it is threatening. Jurassic Park is a great movie about de-extinction. Jurassic Park is a great movie about de-extinction. We should revive extinct species because there are benefits. We should revive extinct species because there are benefits. Dinosaur DNA is no longer salvageable.
The author's main claim in the first paragraph of section #2 is "We should revive extinct species because there are benefits."
Which of Novak's statements reveals his understanding that de-extinction is not a solution for all extinct species?(1 point) Responses "De-extinction lets us bring them back, too." "De-extinction lets us bring them back, too." "The young trees attract beavers, which make dams that draw birds and amphibians." "The young trees attract beavers, which make dams that draw birds and amphibians." "But new genetic technologies enable us to re-create more recently extinct species like passenger pigeons and wooly mammoths." "But new genetic technologies enable us to re-create more recently extinct species like passenger pigeons and wooly mammoths." "Not every extinct species will survive in modern times, and even fewer serve important roles for conservation.
The statement that reveals Novak's understanding that de-extinction is not a solution for all extinct species is "Not every extinct species will survive in modern times, and even fewer serve important roles for conservation."
Which statement is an example of reasoning in Section #2? (HINT: Consider which statement is an opinion and not factual.)(1 point) Responses Conservationists have already had success returning living species to areas where they've died out. Conservationists have already had success returning living species to areas where they've died out. Their extermination a century ago led to environmental problems, such as the decline of certain trees. Their extermination a century ago led to environmental problems, such as the decline of certain trees. But just 20 years after conservationists returned wolves to Yellowstone, the ecosystem is much healthier. But just 20 years after conservationists returned wolves to Yellowstone, the ecosystem is much healthier. We need to focus on bringing back those critical species that will help other living species
The statement "We need to focus on bringing back those critical species that will help other living species" is an example of reasoning in Section #2. It presents an opinion and suggests a course of action based on that opinion.
How does Ben J. Novak mostly support his claim that reviving extinct animals is beneficial?(1 point) Responses by referencing a famous movie by referencing a famous movie by sharing the example of wolves in Yellowstone National Park by sharing the example of wolves in Yellowstone National Park by explaining that dinosaurs cannot be brought back by explaining that dinosaurs cannot be brought back by defining "conservation work"
