Using context clues and your knowledge of word parts, what is the best definition for "salvageable" in the first paragraph of section #2? (1 point) Responses able to be saved able to be saved saved before saved before the state of being saved the state of being saved without being saved
The best definition for "salvageable" in the first paragraph of section #2 is "able to be saved".
is this correct
Yes, that is correct. "Salvageable" means able to be saved.
What is the author's main claim in the first paragraph of section #2?(1 point) Responses We should not revive extinct species because it is threatening. We should not revive extinct species because it is threatening. Jurassic Park is a great movie about de-extinction. Jurassic Park is a great movie about de-extinction. We should revive extinct species because there are benefits. We should revive extinct species because there are benefits. Dinosaur DNA is no longer salvageable.
The author's main claim in the first paragraph of section #2 is "We should revive extinct species because there are benefits."
Which of Novak's statements reveals his understanding that de-extinction is not a solution for all extinct species?(1 point) Responses "De-extinction lets us bring them back, too." "De-extinction lets us bring them back, too." "The young trees attract beavers, which make dams that draw birds and amphibians." "The young trees attract beavers, which make dams that draw birds and amphibians." "But new genetic technologies enable us to re-create more recently extinct species like passenger pigeons and wooly mammoths." "But new genetic technologies enable us to re-create more recently extinct species like passenger pigeons and wooly mammoths." "Not every extinct species will survive in modern times, and even fewer serve important roles for conservation.
The statement that reveals Novak's understanding that de-extinction is not a solution for all extinct species is "Not every extinct species will survive in modern times, and even fewer serve important roles for conservation."
Which statement is an example of reasoning in Section #2? (HINT: Consider which statement is an opinion and not factual.)(1 point) Responses Conservationists have already had success returning living species to areas where they've died out. Conservationists have already had success returning living species to areas where they've died out. Their extermination a century ago led to environmental problems, such as the decline of certain trees. Their extermination a century ago led to environmental problems, such as the decline of certain trees. But just 20 years after conservationists returned wolves to Yellowstone, the ecosystem is much healthier. But just 20 years after conservationists returned wolves to Yellowstone, the ecosystem is much healthier. We need to focus on bringing back those critical species that will help other living species
The statement "We need to focus on bringing back those critical species that will help other living species" is an example of reasoning in Section #2. It presents an opinion and suggests a course of action based on that opinion.
How does Ben J. Novak mostly support his claim that reviving extinct animals is beneficial?(1 point) Responses by referencing a famous movie by referencing a famous movie by sharing the example of wolves in Yellowstone National Park by sharing the example of wolves in Yellowstone National Park by explaining that dinosaurs cannot be brought back by explaining that dinosaurs cannot be brought back by defining "conservation work"
Ben J. Novak mostly supports his claim that reviving extinct animals is beneficial by sharing the example of wolves in Yellowstone National Park.
What strategy does Joseph Bennett use in section #3 that shows the reader he has considered different viewpoints? (1 point) Responses responds to possible counterarguments responds to possible counterarguments uses data and statistics uses data and statistics uses anecdotes uses anecdotes uses testimonialsb
The strategy that Joseph Bennett uses in section #3 that shows the reader he has considered different viewpoints is "responds to possible counterarguments".
Which is a claim that Bennett disagrees with in section #3?(1 point) Responses De-extinction is too expensive. De-extinction is too expensive. De-extinction is risky. De-extinction is risky. De-extinction is harmful to the environment. De-extinction is harmful to the environment. De-extinction is helpful in understanding genetics and breeding.
The claim that Bennett disagrees with in section #3 is "De-extinction is too expensive."
Which is an example of evidence? (HINT: Look for a statement of fact, not an opinion.)(1 point) Responses Although de-extinction has been touted as a way of reversing this horrible trend, this argument doesn't hold up. Although de-extinction has been touted as a way of reversing this horrible trend, this argument doesn't hold up. It may well be interesting science, but it's not conservation. It may well be interesting science, but it's not conservation. Scientists believe that somewhere between 200 and 2,000 species become extinct every year - many more than official counts record. Scientists believe that somewhere between 200 and 2,000 species become extinct every year - many more than official counts record. Why not work on keeping them alive
The statement "Scientists believe that somewhere between 200 and 2,000 species become extinct every year - many more than official counts record." is an example of evidence. It presents a factual statement based on the beliefs of scientists.
Think about the entire article. By referencing the scientist's name, position, and organization, the author uses...(1 point) Responses ethos - appeals to the author's credibility and expertise ethos - appeals to the author's credibility and expertise pathos - appeals to the reader's emotions pathos - appeals to the reader's emotions logos - appeals to logic and reasoning with facts and statistics logos - appeals to logic and reasoning with facts and statistics Oreos - uses cookies to persuade the reader because chocolate is delicious
By referencing the scientist's name, position, and organization, the author uses ethos - appeals to the author's credibility and expertise.
Consider the entire article. What is the author's purpose in writing this article?(1 point) Responses to persuade to persuade to inform to inform to entertain to entertain to describe
The author's purpose in writing this article is to inform.
What is the overall text structure of this article?(1 point) Responses chronological chronological description description cause/effect cause/effect sequential
