Political Participation Quick Check%0D%0A4 of 54 of 5 Items%0D%0A%0D%0AQuestion%0D%0AA state recently conducted an election featuring mail-in voting for the first time. Analyze the voter turnout data from the previous election, which did not feature mail-in voting and the data from the most recent election, which did.%0D%0A%0D%0AIn-Person Election%0D%0A%0D%0AOverall Turnout: 44%%0D%0AMale Turnout: 40%%0D%0AFemale Turnout: 46%%0D%0AUnemployed Turnout: 9%%0D%0AEmployed Turnout: 48%%0D%0AMail-In Election%0D%0A%0D%0AOverall Turnout: 56%%0D%0AMale Turnout: 51%%0D%0AFemale Turnout: 61%%0D%0AUnemployed Turnout: 5%%0D%0AEmployed Turnout: 56%%0D%0AWhat is a reasonable conclusion to draw from this data?%0D%0A%0D%0A(1 point)
To analyze the voter turnout data and draw a reasonable conclusion from it, we should compare the turnout rates between the in-person election and the mail-in election. By comparing the data, we can identify any notable changes in voter participation.
Let's break down the data and compare the turnout rates for each category:
In the in-person election:
- Overall Turnout: 44%
- Male Turnout: 40%
- Female Turnout: 46%
- Unemployed Turnout: 9%
- Employed Turnout: 48%
In the mail-in election:
- Overall Turnout: 56%
- Male Turnout: 51%
- Female Turnout: 61%
- Unemployed Turnout: 5%
- Employed Turnout: 56%
From the data, we observe the following changes:
1. Overall Turnout: The overall turnout increased from 44% in the in-person election to 56% in the mail-in election. This suggests that the introduction of mail-in voting likely contributed to a higher voter turnout.
2. Gender Turnout: Both male and female turnout increased in the mail-in election compared to the in-person election. Male turnout increased from 40% to 51%, and female turnout increased from 46% to 61%. This implies that mail-in voting may have made it more convenient for both genders to participate in the election.
3. Employment Status Turnout: In the in-person election, employed voters had a higher turnout (48%) compared to unemployed voters (9%). However, in the mail-in election, the gap between employed and unemployed voters decreased. Employed turnout remained the same at 56%, while unemployed turnout slightly increased to 5%. This suggests that mail-in voting might have made voting more accessible for unemployed individuals, resulting in a higher participation rate among this group.
Based on this data, a reasonable conclusion to draw is that the introduction of mail-in voting likely led to an increase in voter turnout overall, including among both genders and different employment status groups. Mail-in voting appears to have made it more convenient and accessible for individuals to participate in the election, resulting in higher participation rates across the board.