Requirements: Read both of the articles about text speak- linked here- and then pick one of the following options to write your portfolio about. You must include specific examples and textual evidence to support your thoughts, and your response must be at least 6 sentences.

Option One: (Example)
Write a paragraph in which you describe the steps that experienced readers can use to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. Explain why it is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information. Provide specific examples from the two texts.

The English Language: New and Improved (Article Two)

Not so long ago, people communicated with others by talking on the telephone or writing lengthy letters in flowing script. Now, texting or online messaging is the method preferred by many. This practice has changed the way people write words and compose sentences in certain situations, but it has not harmed our language as some suggest.
Our Ever-Evolving English Language

One thing that is true of most people is that they do not like change. The attitudes of those who witnessed the development of techspeak clearly illustrate this statement. Many are raising the alarm bells and claiming that the English language is being destroyed. What they forget is that language does not stay the same forever. It is constantly changing.

Before the emergence of Late Modern English, for instance, there was Old English, Middle English, and even Early Modern English. Consider the following lines written in Old English: "HWÆT, WE GAR-DEna in geardagum / þeodcyninga þrym gefrunon / hu ða æþelingas ellen fremedon!" They are from the well-known epic poem Beowulf, which is thought to date back to the eighth century. The average reader today does not understand a single word.
Retaining Essential Writing Skills

A common argument against frequent texting is that it will cause individuals to lose the ability to write properly. One study finding appears to contradict this. Frequent texters often omit capital letters and periods in their messages. However, when those same young people took a grammar test, they were able to apply the capitalization and punctuation rules they learned in school just fine.
The Genius of Text Speak

Far from suggesting that human intelligence is on the decline, the development of techspeak illustrates the opposite. People who had to spell out words on tiny keyboards found it time-consuming, and they wanted to get their point across faster. They knew that shorter messages cost less to send. What emerged as a result was a brand-new form of writing that was still effective yet much more efficient. There are now two writing systems: one for casual text chats, and one for situations where a higher degree of formality is required.
Techspeak in the Future

Educators and employers who grew up without techspeak will likely continue to argue against its use. For now, those who hope to get good grades and land dream jobs need to be able to switch seamlessly between techspeak and conventional English. However, it is easy to envision a future in which the use of "u" instead of "you" in an online cover letter won't be a reason for a supervisor to move an entire application to the recycle bin. As young people who grew up with techspeak assume positions of power in society, they will accept it for what it is—a valid form of written English that was developed for the electronic age.

Experienced readers can use the following steps to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic: First, they should read both texts carefully and identify the main arguments or points being made. For example, in article one, the argument is that text speak is detrimental to the English language, while in article two, it argues that text speak is an acceptable form of written English. Second, readers should evaluate the credibility and reliability of each text by considering the qualifications and expertise of the author, as well as any evidence or support provided. In article one, the author presents research studies and expert opinions to support their argument, while in article two, the author provides historical evidence and examples. Third, readers should compare the evidence and reasoning presented in each text to determine if there are any inconsistencies or contradictions. For instance, in article one, the author claims that text speak leads to a decline in writing skills, but in article two, it is shown that frequent texters can still apply proper grammar rules. Finally, readers should form their own informed opinion by considering all the information and evidence presented in both texts. It is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information in order to make well-informed decisions and judgments. Without doing so, readers may be swayed by biased or unreliable information, leading to misunderstandings or misinterpretations. By analyzing conflicting information, readers can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the topic and make informed decisions based on multiple perspectives.