How did I show his intention of ignoring the 1628 Pentation of right?
by refusing to sign it
by dissolving parliament
by forming the church of England
by ending the commonwealth
By refusing to sign it, dissolving parliament, forming the Church of England, and ending the Commonwealth, you showed your intention of ignoring the 1628 Petition of Right.
I apologize for the misunderstanding in my previous response. Please understand that as an AI language model, I do not have access to personal information or previous interactions. Therefore, without any context, it is difficult for me to understand what "a, b, c, d" represent in the given question. If you could provide more details or clarify your question, I'll be happy to assist you further.
How did I show his intention of ignoring the 1628 Pentation of right?
a
b
c
d
I apologize for any confusion. Without further context or information, it is not possible for me to determine how each option (a, b, c, d) corresponds to showing an intention of ignoring the 1628 Petition of Right. If you could provide more details or rephrase the question, I would be glad to assist you.
How did I show his intention of ignoring the 1628 Pentation of right?
a by refusing to sign it
c by dissolving parliament
b by forming the church of England
d by ending the commonwealth
To show the intention of ignoring the 1628 Petition of Right, the actions described in options a, b, and d indicate a disregard for the principles outlined in the petition:
a) By refusing to sign it: By not putting your signature on the document, you indicate a lack of acknowledgment and willingness to abide by its terms.
b) By forming the Church of England: The formation of the Church of England does not directly relate to ignoring the Petition of Right, as the petition primarily focused on curbing the king's power. However, if the intention behind forming the Church of England was to consolidate power and circumvent the rights and privileges outlined in the petition, it could be seen as an indirect way of ignoring it.
d) By ending the Commonwealth: If the Commonwealth was established to uphold the principles stated in the petition, ending it would imply a disregard for those principles and could be seen as ignoring the Petition of Right.
Regarding option c, dissolving parliament, it does not directly correspond to showing an intention of ignoring the Petition of Right, as the petition was actually drafted by parliament as a means to address grievances with the king's actions. Dissolving parliament could potentially hinder the progress of the petition, but it does not necessarily indicate an intention to ignore it.
In summary, options a, b, and d indicate actions that can be perceived as showing an intention of ignoring the 1628 Petition of Right, while option c does not directly align with that intention.
THEN WHATS THE ASWER
To clarify, the answer would be a) by refusing to sign it.
By refusing to sign the 1628 Petition of Right, someone demonstrates their intention of ignoring it, as signing the petition signifies a willingness to acknowledge and abide by its terms.
To determine how you showed his intention of ignoring the 1628 Petition of Right, we need to understand the context of the Petition and analyze your actions based on that.
The Petition of Right was a legal document presented to King Charles I of England in 1628 by Parliament. It sought to secure the rights and liberties of the people by addressing issues such as unlawful imprisonment, unfair taxation, and the quartering of troops.
Based on your provided options, there are two actions that could demonstrate an intention to ignore the Petition of Right:
1. By refusing to sign it: If you were given the opportunity to sign the Petition but chose not to, it could indicate a disregard for the demands put forth in the document.
2. By dissolving Parliament: The act of dissolving Parliament could suggest a rejection of the Petition's authority and a desire to avoid its implementation or enforcement.
However, the other options you mentioned are not directly related to the Petition of Right:
- Forming the Church of England: While King Charles I's actions related to religion were controversial and contributed to social and political tensions, they do not specifically address the Petition of Right.
- Ending the Commonwealth: The Commonwealth period in England occurred after the English Civil War (1642-1651) and involved the temporary abolition of the monarchy, which is beyond the timeframe of the 1628 Petition of Right.
In conclusion, based on the provided options, refusing to sign the Petition and dissolving Parliament would better demonstrate an intention to ignore the 1628 Petition of Right.
a
b
c
d