have prepared you to complete a piece of analytical writing. Recall what you have learned in this portfolio to write an analysis of the texts,
“Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World” by Yonathan Zohar
Read aloud....Feed the World Y. Zohar
and “Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon” by Rick Moonen.
Read aloud: Say No....R. Moonen
Use the prompts to guide your response.
Your portfolio must include the following:
-A minimum one paragraph response to each of the questions listed. No introduction or conclusion are needed. You will turn in at least three paragraphs.
-In-text citations when referencing the two articles. Ex. (Zohar) or (Moonen)
Textbook Directions:Write a paragraph in which you describe the steps that experienced readers can use to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. Explain why it is important for readers to recognize and evaluate conflicting information. Provide specific examples from the two texts.
Experienced readers can use several steps to analyze conflicting information in texts about the same topic. First, they should read each text carefully and identify the main arguments presented by the authors. This allows readers to understand the different perspectives and opinions being discussed. For example, in the article "Genetically Modified Salmon Can Feed the World" by Yonathan Zohar, the author argues that genetically modified salmon can be a solution to feeding a growing population. On the other hand, in Rick Moonen's article "Say No to Genetically Engineered Salmon," the author opposes the idea of genetically modified salmon and raises concerns about its potential risks and harm to the environment.
Second, experienced readers should evaluate the credibility and expertise of the authors in order to determine the reliability of the information presented. This can be done by researching their qualifications, affiliations, and previous works. In the case of Zohar, he is a professor of aquatic science and aquaculture, which adds credibility to his arguments regarding the benefits of genetically modified salmon. Moonen, on the other hand, is a renowned chef and sustainable seafood advocate, which provides him with expertise on the potential negative impacts of genetically engineered salmon.
Lastly, it is crucial for readers to critically analyze the evidence and reasoning provided by the authors to support their claims. By evaluating the strength and validity of the arguments, readers can make informed decisions about the conflicting information presented. For instance, Zohar presents scientific studies and research to support his claim that genetically modified salmon can help address food shortages. In contrast, Moonen highlights potential ecological consequences and ethical concerns related to genetically modified salmon.
Recognizing and evaluating conflicting information is important for readers as it enables them to develop a well-rounded understanding of the topic. By considering different perspectives, readers can make informed decisions and form their own opinions. In the case of the two texts, recognizing the conflicting information allows readers to weigh the potential benefits and risks of genetically modified salmon and decide whether they support its usage or not.