Both the short story “The Rhinoceros,” by Eugene Ionesco, and the poem “And Yet the Books” by Czeslaw Milosz are works that are critical of the rise of facism and the Nazi party in Europe in the early part of the 20th century. Though their themes may be similar, the writings reflect very different styles and approaches.
Q: Which of the two works do you like better or that you think is the most effective?
Write a three-paragraph essay that briefly summarizes and comments on the writings and explains your view toward them. Be sure to include textual evidence to support your analysis.
Paragraph 1
R- restate prompt
Introduce both pieces of writing including the author’s names.
A- Answer question
Discuss the varying styles and approaches of both writers and state which one you found the most effective.
paragraph 2
Topic Sentence
Which story do you think was the least effective? Explain why.
paragraph 2
C- cite
another example
Cite one example using a direct quote from the story to support your answer.
E- Explain
Explain why you chose that quote.
paragraph 3
Topic Sentence
Which story do you think was the most effective? Explain why.
paragraph 3
C- cite
examples
Cite one example using a direct quote from the story to support your answer.
paragraph 4
E- Explain
Explain why you chose that quote.
In comparing the works of Eugene Ionesco's short story "The Rhinoceros" and Czeslaw Milosz's poem "And Yet the Books," it is clear that both authors are critical of the rise of fascism and the Nazi party in Europe during the early 20th century. However, their writings reflect very different styles and approaches. Personally, I found Milosz's poem to be the most effective in conveying the message against fascism.
In "The Rhinoceros," Ionesco employs absurdist elements to depict the transformation of individuals into rhinoceroses, symbolizing the mass conformity to fascism. While this approach may be thought-provoking and unconventional, I found it less effective in conveying the seriousness and horror of the situation. For example, when Berenger's friend, Jean, transforms into a rhinoceros, Berenger is initially in denial and refuses to accept what he sees. This scene, while absurd, fails to fully capture the destruction and danger that fascism poses.
On the other hand, Milosz's poem "And Yet the Books" takes a more direct and poignant approach in criticizing fascism. The poem speaks of books as a symbol of resistance and knowledge in the face of oppression. Milosz writes, "When life shrinks and fades away,/ books remain unerased,/ mankind's sure reserve." This quote beautifully encapsulates the power of literature to endure and provide solace during dark times. By emphasizing the importance of books as a source of enlightenment and strength, Milosz effectively conveys his message against fascism.
In conclusion, while both Ionesco's "The Rhinoceros" and Milosz's "And Yet the Books" express criticism towards fascism, Milosz's poem stands out as the more effective piece. By employing direct and powerful language, Milosz conveys the importance of knowledge and resistance in the face of oppression. His words resonate deeply and serve as a reminder of the dangers of fascism, making "And Yet the Books" a highly impactful and thought-provoking work.