Analyze how the Mexican government avoided making a decision about slavery.(1 point)

Responses

They left it up to the individual states.
They left it up to the individual states.

They let Stephen F. Austin decide.
They let Stephen F. Austin decide.

They pretended slavery did not exist.
They pretended slavery did not exist.

They let each person decide for themselves.

They left it up to the individual states.

How did Texans work around Article 13?(1 point)

Responses

They asked the government to change its mind.
They asked the government to change its mind.

They ignored the new laws in Article 13.
They ignored the new laws in Article 13.

They made the Mexican government agree to honor labor contracts.
They made the Mexican government agree to honor labor contracts.

They lied to the government about when enslaved people were born.

They made the Mexican government agree to honor labor contracts.

What economic impact did using the labor of enslaved people have on the new settlement?(1 point)

Responses

The economy was hurt because there was not enough land for everyone.
The economy was hurt because there was not enough land for everyone.

The economy struggled because there were too many people to feed.
The economy struggled because there were too many people to feed.

There economy boomed because more people were able to buy goods.
There economy boomed because more people were able to buy goods.

The economy grew because Texas was able to plant and harvest more cotton for free.

The economy grew because Texas was able to plant and harvest more cotton for free.

Which of the following best explains why there was confusion over the status of enslaved people in Texas?(1 point)

Responses

There were more free Black people in Texas than enslaved Black people.
There were more free Black people in Texas than enslaved Black people.

Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other.
Mexican law and Mexican policy contradicted each other.

Most Anglo-American settlers were in favor of the abolition of slavery, but the government of Mexico was not.
Most Anglo-American settlers were in favor of the abolition of slavery, but the government of Mexico was not.

Mexican law allowed slavery in a variety of circumstances.

Mexican law allowed slavery in a variety of circumstances.

Which of the following best explains why the Mexican government allowed Anglo-American settlers to bring enslaved people to Texas?(1 point)

Responses

The Mexican government was pressured by the U.S. government.
The Mexican government was pressured by the U.S. government.

The Mexican government wanted Anglo-Americans to buy land in Texas.
The Mexican government wanted Anglo-Americans to buy land in Texas.

Slavery was legal in Mexico.
Slavery was legal in Mexico.

The Mexican government had no position on slavery.

The Mexican government wanted Anglo-Americans to buy land in Texas.

To analyze how the Mexican government avoided making a decision about slavery, we need to examine the options provided and understand their significance.

1) They left it up to the individual states.
This option suggests that the Mexican government delegated the decision-making power regarding slavery to the individual states within Mexico. By doing so, the government avoided taking a stance on the issue and allowed each state to determine its own policies regarding slavery.

2) They let Stephen F. Austin decide.
Stephen F. Austin was an American empresario in Mexican Texas during the early 1800s. This option implies that the Mexican government granted Austin the authority to make decisions regarding slavery in the region he governed. By entrusting Austin with this responsibility, the government was effectively avoiding making a direct decision on the issue.

3) They pretended slavery did not exist.
This option implies that the Mexican government adopted an approach of ignoring or disregarding the existence of slavery within their jurisdiction. By pretending slavery did not exist, the government avoided confronting the issue and sidestepped the need to make a decision or take any action regarding slavery.

4) They let each person decide for themselves.
This option suggests that the Mexican government took a hands-off approach, allowing individuals to decide for themselves whether to practice or support slavery. By adopting this stance, the government avoided imposing a definitive policy or taking a firm stance on the issue.

In sum, the Mexican government's avoidance of making a decision about slavery was achieved through various means: delegating the decision-making power to states or individuals, allowing someone like Stephen F. Austin to decide, pretending slavery didn't exist, or letting each person decide individually. These strategies allowed the government to evade taking a clear position on the contentious issue of slavery.