Analyze how the Mexican government avoided making a decision about slavery.(1 point)
Responses
They left it up to the individual states.
They left it up to the individual states.
They let Stephen F. Austin decide.
They let Stephen F. Austin decide.
They pretended slavery did not exist.
They pretended slavery did not exist.
They let each person decide for themselves
. They let each person decide for themselves.
Analyzing how the Mexican government avoided making a decision about slavery:
1. They left it up to the individual states: One way the Mexican government avoided making a decision about slavery was by leaving it up to the individual states. This meant that each state could individually decide whether or not to allow slavery.
2. They let Stephen F. Austin decide: Another approach taken by the Mexican government was to let Stephen F. Austin, a prominent leader in Texas, make decisions regarding slavery. Austin was granted a considerable amount of power and influence in the region, and his decisions on slavery were therefore influential.
3. They pretended slavery did not exist: The Mexican government also had a strategy of pretending that slavery did not exist. By deliberately ignoring the issue or downplaying its significance, they could avoid having to make a concrete decision on the matter.
4. They let each person decide for themselves: Additionally, the Mexican government allowed each person to decide for themselves whether to participate in or support slavery. This meant that individuals had the freedom to choose their stance on the issue, ultimately avoiding a centralized government decision.
These were some of the ways in which the Mexican government avoided making a firm decision regarding slavery.
To analyze how the Mexican government avoided making a decision about slavery, we can break down the given responses and examine their implications:
1. They left it up to the individual states.
This means that the Mexican government did not take a definitive stance on slavery and instead allowed each state within the country to decide whether to allow or abolish it. By decentralizing the decision-making process, the government avoided taking direct responsibility for the issue.
2. They let Stephen F. Austin decide.
Stephen F. Austin was an important figure during the era of Mexican rule in Texas. This response suggests that the Mexican government delegated the decision regarding slavery to Austin, effectively leaving it in his hands. This way, the government could avoid direct involvement in the decision-making process.
3. They pretended slavery did not exist.
This response implies that the Mexican government intentionally ignored the issue of slavery, effectively denying its existence within the country. By pretending that slavery was not a problem, the government avoided having to address the issue and make a decision.
4. They let each person decide for themselves.
This means that the Mexican government allowed individuals to make their own choices regarding slavery. By taking a hands-off approach, the government sidestepped the responsibility of making a decision as a collective entity.
In summary, the Mexican government avoided making a decision about slavery by decentralizing the issue to individual states or individuals, allowing them to determine their own stance on slavery. Additionally, they might have pretended that slavery did not exist, effectively avoiding addressing the issue altogether.