Which statement best analyzes the effect of leadership on the collapse of the Mongol Empire?
Leaders such as Kublai Khan were assassinated by rival Mongol leaders, leaving the khanates open to invasion.
Disputes over leadership led to the fragmentation of the Mongol Empire into smaller khanates.
Disputes over leadership were resolved by giving Genghis Khan control over the entire Mongol Empire
Leaders such as Timur failed to respond to the bubonic plague, leading to widespread death within the khanates.
The best statement that analyzes the effect of leadership on the collapse of the Mongol Empire is: Disputes over leadership led to the fragmentation of the Mongol Empire into smaller khanates.
The statement that best analyzes the effect of leadership on the collapse of the Mongol Empire is as follows: "Disputes over leadership led to the fragmentation of the Mongol Empire into smaller khanates."
To understand why this statement is the best analysis, let's break it down:
1. Disputes over leadership: The Mongol Empire experienced power struggles and conflicts among different leaders vying for control.
2. Fragmentation of the Mongol Empire: These disputes led to the division of the empire into smaller and separate regions called khanates. Instead of having a unified empire under centralized rule, the Mongol Empire became fragmented.
This analysis highlights the significant impact of leadership disputes on the collapse of the Mongol Empire. Rather than having a strong and united leadership, the constant conflicts weakened the empire, making it susceptible to external pressures and invasions.
To arrive at this analysis, it is important to study historical sources and documents about the Mongol Empire, particularly the period leading to its decline. Analyzing primary and secondary sources, such as historical accounts, letters, and scholarly articles, allows researchers to gather evidence and draw conclusions about the effect of leadership on the empire's collapse.