The Supreme Court case of Carey v. Musladin involved a
murder case in which the family of the victims wore buttons
with images of the victim to the trial. What Sixth
Amendment protection was in question in Carey v.
Musladin? (1 point)
right to public trial
right to be informed of charges
right to an impartial jury
right to cross-examine the individuals wearing buttons
The correct answer is: right to an impartial jury.
The Sixth Amendment protection in question in Carey v. Musladin was the right to an impartial jury.
In the case of Carey v. Musladin, the issue at hand was whether the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury was violated. The question was whether the family members of the victims, who were wearing buttons with images of the victims, prejudiced the jury and compromised the defendant's right to a fair trial. Evidence or factors that may sway the jurors' opinions or affect their impartiality can be seen as a potential violation of the defendant's rights. The Sixth Amendment protects the defendant's right to have a jury that is unbiased and does not have any preconceived notions or prejudices. So, in this particular case, the concern was whether the button-wearing family members compromised the impartiality of the jury, and therefore, the defendant's right to a fair trial.
