The Supreme Court case of Carey v. Musladin involved a murder case in which the family of the victims wore buttons with images of the victim to the trial. What Sixth Amendment protection was in question in Carey v. Musladin?(1 point)
Responses
right to be informed of charges
right to be informed of charges
right to cross-examine the individuals wearing buttons
right to cross-examine the individuals wearing buttons
right to an impartial jury
right to an impartial jury
The Sixth Amendment protection that was in question in Carey v. Musladin was the right to an impartial jury.
The correct answer in this case is the right to an impartial jury. In Carey v. Musladin, the Supreme Court was presented with the question of whether the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury was violated by the presence of spectators wearing buttons with images of the victim during the trial. The buttons could potentially influence the emotions and prejudices of the jurors, which could compromise the defendant's right to a fair trial. To get this answer, you can research the details of the case and the arguments made by both sides to understand the specific constitutional protection at issue.
