The Supreme Court case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. involved a child support dispute in which prosecutors used peremptory challenges to reject most of the men in the jury pool. Analyze the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did?(1 point)ResponsesPeremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.Peremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause.The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause.The attorneys used secret trial proceedings.The attorneys used secret trial proceedings.

Question

The Supreme Court case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. involved a child support dispute in which prosecutors used peremptory challenges to reject most of the men in the jury pool. Analyze the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did?(1 point)ResponsesPeremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.Peremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause.The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause.The attorneys used secret trial proceedings.The attorneys used secret trial proceedings.

Answer 1

The most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994) is that they found peremptory challenges on the basis of gender to be a violation of the Sixth Amendment.

Answer 2

The most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994) is that peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment. The case involved prosecutors using peremptory challenges to reject most of the men in the jury pool, which was seen as discriminatory on the basis of gender. The ruling in this case established that gender-based peremptory challenges violated a defendant's rights under the Sixth Amendment to a fair and impartial jury.

Answer 3

The Supreme Court case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994) involved a child support dispute in which prosecutors used peremptory challenges to reject most of the men in the jury pool. To analyze the case and determine the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did, we need to consider the information provided.

Peremptory challenges allow attorneys to dismiss potential jurors without providing a specific reason. However, these challenges are not supposed to be used to discriminate against jurors based on their race or gender. The key issue in this case was whether the use of peremptory challenges based on gender violated the Sixth Amendment.

In JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B, the state of Alabama used gender-based peremptory challenges to remove men from the jury pool. The defendant, Joe E. Barrow Jr. (JEB), argued that this practice was unconstitutional and violated the Sixth Amendment.

The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the right to a trial by an impartial jury, which means that jurors should be selected without discrimination based on race or gender. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that peremptory challenges based solely on gender were indeed a violation of the Sixth Amendment.

Therefore, the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. is that peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were found to be a violation of the Sixth Amendment.