The Supreme Court case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. involved a child support dispute in which prosecutors used peremptory challenges to reject most of the men in the jury pool. Analyze the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994). Which of the following is the most likely reason the justices ruled as they did?(1 point) Responses Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment. Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment. The attorneys used secret trial proceedings. The attorneys used secret trial proceedings. The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause. The attorneys used the Confrontation Clause. Peremptory challenges on the basis of race were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
The most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994) is:
Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
The most likely reason the justices ruled as they did in the case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994) is that peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Sixth Amendment.
To analyze the Supreme Court case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. (1994), we can look at the key details and the arguments presented in the case.
The case of JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. revolved around a child support dispute in which prosecutors in Alabama used peremptory challenges to exclude most of the men in the jury pool. Peremptory challenges allow attorneys to dismiss potential jurors without providing a specific reason.
In this case, it was argued that the prosecutors' use of peremptory challenges based on the gender of the potential jurors violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The most likely reason the justices ruled as they did would be: "Peremptory challenges on the basis of gender were a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment."
By examining the facts and arguments presented, it becomes clear that the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the defendant, JEB, and held that allowing peremptory challenges based solely on gender was unconstitutional. This decision was made based on the principle of equal protection, which prohibits discrimination based on gender.
To find this answer, you could refer to the actual Supreme Court decision or access reliable legal resources that discuss the JEB v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. case. These resources may include legal databases, scholarly articles, or even official court records to gain a comprehensive understanding of the case and the rationale behind the Supreme Court's ruling.