Fault B cuts across several layers of rock. Which conclusion can be made?
Fault B is older than laver C based on the law on inclusion
O Fault B is older than laver D based on the law of crosscutting
O Fault B is younger than laver D base on the law of inclusion
• Fault B is vounger than layer C based on the law of crosscutting
The correct conclusion is: Fault B is younger than layer C based on the law of crosscutting.
To determine which conclusion can be made about Fault B and the layers of rock, we need to apply the principles of relative dating. Two important principles that can help us determine the sequence of events are the Law of Inclusion and the Law of Crosscutting.
1. Law of Inclusion: This principle states that a rock or layer of sediment that contains fragments of another rock or layer must be younger than the fragments it contains. In other words, the inclusion must have existed before the rock or layer that contains it formed.
2. Law of Crosscutting: This principle states that any feature, such as a fault or intrusion, that cuts across a rock or layer must be younger than the rock or layer it cuts across. The fault or intrusion must have occurred after the rock or layer it cuts through was already present.
Given the information provided, Fault B cuts across several layers of rock. Based on the information, we can come to the following conclusion:
• Fault B is younger than layer C based on the Law of Crosscutting.
The reason is that Fault B cut across layer C, which means Fault B must have formed after layer C was already present.
Therefore, the correct conclusion is that Fault B is younger than layer C based on the Law of Crosscutting.