What freedom did Chandragupta’s subjects lack?(1 point)Responsesfreedom to earn a livingfreedom to earn a livingfreedom to travel to different provincesfreedom to travel to different provincesfreedom of speechfreedom of speechfreedom to worship as they pleasedfreedom to worship as they pleased
The freedom of speech
The freedom that Chandragupta's subjects lacked was freedom of speech.
To determine which freedom Chandragupta's subjects lack, we need to examine each option and eliminate ones that were not restricted during his rule.
1. Freedom to earn a living: During Chandragupta's reign, there is no historical evidence to suggest that his subjects were restricted in their ability to earn a living. They were allowed to engage in various economic activities.
2. Freedom to travel to different provinces: Although there might have been restrictions on travel in certain circumstances, such as for military or administrative purposes, there is no specific information to indicate that Chandragupta imposed limitations on his subjects' freedom to travel freely between provinces.
3. Freedom of speech: This is a potential candidate since rulers often place constraints on freedom of expression. However, it is important to note that Chandragupta's governance was influenced by strict administrative codes, where citizens had to adhere to specific rules and regulations. While it is possible that there were limitations on free speech under his rule, there is no direct evidence to support this claim.
4. Freedom to worship as they pleased: Chandragupta was a follower of Jainism, which is known for its tolerance and acceptance of diverse religious beliefs. Therefore, it is unlikely that he restricted his subjects' freedom to worship as they pleased. Religious freedom was generally respected during his reign.
Based on the information available, it appears that the freedom Chandragupta's subjects lacked was freedom of speech. However, it is important to note that the available historical sources provide limited information, and thus, we cannot make definitive assertions about the specific freedoms his subjects lacked.