Which of the following examples accurately contrasts political participation in democratic and authoritarian systems of government?(1 point)

Responses

Democratic governments rarely hold elections; authoritarian governments hold regular elections.
Democratic governments rarely hold elections; authoritarian governments hold regular elections.

Free speech has no effect on the function of society in democratic systems; authoritarian governments’ limits on free speech make their societies work better.
Free speech has no effect on the function of society in democratic systems; authoritarian governments’ limits on free speech make their societies work better.

Authoritarian governments harshly punish speech that is critical of the government and its leaders; democratic governments do not.
Authoritarian governments harshly punish speech that is critical of the government and its leaders; democratic governments do not.

Democratic governments do not tolerate nonviolent forms of protest; authoritarian governments do.

Democratic governments do not tolerate nonviolent forms of protest; authoritarian governments do.

Contrasting political participation in democratic and authoritarian systems of government, an accurate example would be:

Authoritarian governments harshly punish speech that is critical of the government and its leaders, while democratic governments do not restrict or punish such speech.

The contrast between political participation in democratic and authoritarian systems of government can be found in the option:

Authoritarian governments harshly punish speech that is critical of the government and its leaders; democratic governments do not.

To arrive at this answer, we can analyze the characteristics of political participation in both systems. In democratic governments, citizens have the right to express their opinions freely, including being critical of the government without fear of severe punishment. Conversely, in authoritarian systems, the government tends to suppress dissent and punish individuals who speak out against the government or its leaders.

By understanding the basic principles and behaviors of each system of government, we can conclude that the contrast in political participation lies in the treatment of critical speech by the respective governments.