Read the following excerpt from Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka:%0D%0A%0D%0A“We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment . . . ..”%0D%0A%0D%0ADescribe the political strategy used to eliminate discrepancies between Black Americans and American ideals through this court case.%0D%0A%0D%0A(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0ASocial movements demonstrated in large groups.%0D%0ASocial movements demonstrated in large groups.%0D%0A%0D%0AInterest groups create political alliances with parties.%0D%0AInterest groups create political alliances with parties.%0D%0A%0D%0ACongress wrote and passed laws addressing unfairness.%0D%0ACongress wrote and passed laws addressing unfairness.%0D%0A%0D%0AInterest groups litigated unfair laws in the Supreme Court.
Interest groups litigated unfair laws in the Supreme Court.
The political strategy used to eliminate discrepancies between Black Americans and American ideals through the Brown v. Board of Education court case was interest groups litigating unfair laws in the Supreme Court. This strategy involved taking the issue of segregation in public schools to the highest court in the land to challenge the doctrine of "separate but equal." The interest groups, led by the NAACP, filed lawsuits on behalf of plaintiffs who were affected by segregation. The Supreme Court's decision in the case ultimately declared that separate educational facilities were inherently unequal, effectively overturning the "separate but equal" doctrine.
The political strategy used to eliminate discrepancies between Black Americans and American ideals through the court case of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was through interest groups litigating unfair laws in the Supreme Court.
By bringing the case before the Supreme Court, the plaintiffs and their supporters sought to challenge the legality of the "separate but equal" doctrine that allowed for racial segregation in public education. Through litigation, they argued that separate educational facilities based on race were inherently unequal and violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Interest groups, such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), played a crucial role in identifying suitable lawsuits and providing legal representation to plaintiffs. They strategically chose cases that would allow the Supreme Court to address broader issues of racial injustice and discrimination.
In the case of Brown v. Board of Education, the litigation strategy paid off when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. In their unanimous decision, the Court declared that separate educational facilities were inherently unequal and a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law. This landmark ruling played a significant role in desegregating public schools and challenging the racial disparities that existed at the time.
Therefore, the strategy of using interest groups to litigate unfair laws in the Supreme Court, as seen in Brown v. Board of Education, was a key political approach to addressing discrepancies between Black Americans and American ideals.