How was the government outlined in the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut (FOC) different from the government in Massachusetts? Select all that apply.
(1 point)
• The FOC gave the vote to all men who were property owners.
• The FOC limited the governor's power which expanded the idea of representative government.
n The FOC increased the control the King of England had on the colony.
• The FOC outlined strict requirements for slavery.
The correct answers are:
• The FOC gave the vote to all men who were property owners.
• The FOC limited the governor's power which expanded the idea of representative government.
• The FOC outlined strict requirements for slavery.
The correct options are:
• The FOC gave the vote to all men who were property owners.
• The FOC limited the governor's power which expanded the idea of representative government.
To determine the differences between the government outlined in the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut (FOC) and the government in Massachusetts, we need to carefully analyze the given options.
1. The FOC gave the vote to all men who were property owners.
According to the FOC, the right to vote was indeed granted to all men who were property owners. However, this does not necessarily differentiate the government in Connecticut from that of Massachusetts, as voting rights based on property ownership were common in many early colonial governments. Therefore, this option is not valid.
2. The FOC limited the governor's power, which expanded the idea of representative government.
This statement accurately represents one of the key distinctions between the government outlined in the FOC and the government in Massachusetts. The FOC implemented restrictions on the governor's power, which aimed to establish a more balanced and representative form of government. Therefore, this option is valid and should be selected.
3. The FOC increased the control the King of England had on the colony.
This option is incorrect. The FOC, in fact, aimed to decrease the control that the King of England had on the colony, as it was created as a written constitution to govern the colony without excessive interference from the Crown. Therefore, this option is not valid.
4. The FOC outlined strict requirements for slavery.
The FOC did not outline specific requirements for slavery. Slavery was not a central focus of the FOC, and it did not address the institution of slavery in significant detail. Therefore, this option is not valid.
To summarize, the government outlined in the FOC was different from the government in Massachusetts in that the FOC limited the governor's power, which expanded the idea of representative government.