Which statement best describes the events that led to the arrest of Stephen F. Austin?(1 point) Responses Because of his previous work with Mexican President Bustamante and Mier y Terán, Santa Anna did not trust Austin and thought he wanted to start a revolution against Mexico. Because of his previous work with Mexican President Bustamante and Mier y Terán, Santa Anna did not trust Austin and thought he wanted to start a revolution against Mexico. Austin served in a leadership position in the Conventions of 1832 and 1833, so he wanted Texas to separate from Mexico. Austin served in a leadership position in the Conventions of 1832 and 1833, so he wanted Texas to separate from Mexico. Austin went to Mexico City to discuss issues regarding Texas residents and request a repeal of the Law of April 6, 1830. These actions concerned Santa Anna. The Mexican government became suspicious of Austin because it thought he was trying to start a rebellion. Austin went to Mexico City to discuss issues regarding Texas residents and request a repeal of the Law of April 6, 1830. These actions concerned Santa Anna. The Mexican government became suspicious of Austin because it thought he was trying to start a rebellion. Austin visited with Mexican President Bustamante and Mier y Terán about the situation in Texas and the growing discontent among the settlers about the Law of April 6, 1830.

Austin visited with Mexican President Bustamante and Mier y Terán about the situation in Texas and the growing discontent among the settlers about the Law of April 6, 1830.

The statement that best describes the events that led to the arrest of Stephen F. Austin is:

Austin went to Mexico City to discuss issues regarding Texas residents and request a repeal of the Law of April 6, 1830. These actions concerned Santa Anna. The Mexican government became suspicious of Austin because it thought he was trying to start a rebellion.

Who was the American empresario who eventually separated from the colony of Texas and formed the state of Fredonia after his charter was revoked by the Mexican government?(1 point) Responses John Davis Bradburn John Davis Bradburn Haden Edwards Haden Edwards Stephen F. Austin Stephen F. Austin William B. Travis

Haden Edwards

The statement that best describes the events that led to the arrest of Stephen F. Austin is: Austin went to Mexico City to discuss issues regarding Texas residents and request a repeal of the Law of April 6, 1830. These actions concerned Santa Anna. The Mexican government became suspicious of Austin because it thought he was trying to start a rebellion.

To arrive at this answer, we need to analyze the different statements provided and evaluate their accuracy in relation to the events leading to Austin's arrest.

Statement 1: "Because of his previous work with Mexican President Bustamante and Mier y Terán, Santa Anna did not trust Austin and thought he wanted to start a revolution against Mexico."
This statement implies that Santa Anna's distrust of Austin was based on his past connections and the suspicion of wanting to start a revolution. While Austin's previous work may have influenced Santa Anna's perception to some extent, it does not directly explain the events leading to his arrest.

Statement 2: "Austin served in a leadership position in the Conventions of 1832 and 1833, so he wanted Texas to separate from Mexico."
This statement suggests that Austin's involvement in the conventions and his desire for Texas to separate from Mexico led to his arrest. However, it does not specify the direct chain of events that resulted in his arrest.

Statement 3: "Austin went to Mexico City to discuss issues regarding Texas residents and request a repeal of the Law of April 6, 1830. These actions concerned Santa Anna. The Mexican government became suspicious of Austin because it thought he was trying to start a rebellion."
This statement provides a clear sequence of events that directly led to Austin's arrest. It states that Austin traveled to Mexico City with the intention of addressing concerns of Texas residents and requesting the repeal of a particular law. These actions raised suspicion among Santa Anna and the Mexican government, who believed Austin might be trying to incite a rebellion.

Statement 4: "Austin visited with Mexican President Bustamante and Mier y Terán about the situation in Texas and the growing discontent among the settlers about the Law of April 6, 1830."
This statement highlights Austin's visit with Mexican President Bustamante and Mier y Terán to discuss the situation in Texas, including the discontent among settlers regarding a specific law. While this context provides background information for understanding the events, it does not explicitly explain the specific events that led to Austin's arrest.

Thus, in analyzing the statements, statement 3: "Austin went to Mexico City to discuss issues regarding Texas residents and request a repeal of the Law of April 6, 1830. These actions concerned Santa Anna. The Mexican government became suspicious of Austin because it thought he was trying to start a rebellion." is the most accurate and comprehensive explanation of the events leading to Stephen F. Austin's arrest.

Who was the president of Mexico when the Law of April 6, 1830, was passed and when the civil war started?(1 point) Responses Lucas Alamán y Escalada Lucas Alamán y Escalada Antonio López de Santa Anna Antonio López de Santa Anna Anastasio Bustamante Anastasio Bustamante Manuel de Mier y Terán

The president of Mexico when the Law of April 6, 1830, was passed and when the civil war started was Anastasio Bustamante.

Which statement best explains why Mexican officials were so worried about Manuel de Mier y Terán’s report?(1 poin

Manuel de Mier y Terán’s report was a comprehensive investigation of the situation in Texas and outlined the growing influence of American settlers, their disregard for Mexican laws and customs, and the potential threat of Texas separating from Mexico. The report also highlighted the need for increased Mexican presence and control in the region. This caused Mexican officials to worry about the potential loss of Texas and the undermining of Mexico's authority in the region.

Which statement best explains why Mexican officials were so worried about Manuel de Mier y Terán’s report?(1 point) Responses The report stated that European settlers would join the Anglos against the government, so they should not be let in. The report stated that European settlers would join the Anglos against the government, so they should not be let in. The report made it clear the Anglos were large in number and unhappy with the government. The report made it clear the Anglos were large in number and unhappy with the government. The report claimed to know for sure that the Anglos were working with the U.S. to help it acquire Texas. The report claimed to know for sure that the Anglos were working with the U.S. to help it acquire Texas. The report said that the Anglos were partnering with the local Indigenous people to rebel against the government. The report said that the Anglos were partnering with the local Indigenous people to rebel against the government.