Could the early cave paintings be considered graphic design?
(1 point)
Yes, they are two dimensional and used symbols.
Yes, any art that expresses meaning is graphic design.
No, graphic design needs to have some commercial purpose.
No, graphic design generally pairs words and is printed or published
which is right
Yes, they are two dimensional and used symbols.
All of the options presented have some validity, but the most accurate answer would be:
Yes, they are two dimensional and used symbols.
Early cave paintings can be considered a form of graphic design because they meet the criteria of being two-dimensional and using visual symbols to convey meaning. Graphic design encompasses various mediums and can be seen as a means of visual communication, which cave paintings inherently are. However, it is important to note that cave paintings did not have a commercial purpose, and they predate the traditional concepts of graphic design that involve pairing words and printing or publishing.
The correct answer to the question is:
No, graphic design generally pairs words and is printed or published.
While early cave paintings are forms of visual communication and may contain symbols, they do not meet the criteria of graphic design. Graphic design typically involves the intentional arrangement of words and images to convey a message, often with a commercial or communicative purpose. It commonly refers to the creation of designs for print or digital media. Cave paintings, on the other hand, were not created with the intention to serve a commercial purpose or to be reproduced through printing or publishing.