In 1–2 sentences, develop an argument to support the concept of judicial restraint in the Supreme Court’s decisions of Plessy v. Ferguson and the concept of judicial activism in the Supreme Court’s decision of Brown v. Board of Education.
Judicial restraint was upheld in the Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, as it allowed for the preservation of social traditions and the constitutional principle of separate but equal; conversely, the concept of judicial activism was applied in the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education to actively address and correct a longstanding injustice by declaring segregation in public schools unconstitutional.
The argument for judicial restraint in the Supreme Court's decision of Plessy v. Ferguson is that the Court upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation, deferring to the legislative branch's authority and prescription of separate but equal facilities. On the other hand, the argument for judicial activism in the Supreme Court's decision of Brown v. Board of Education is that the Court overturned the longstanding precedent, opting to intervene and use its power to strike down racially segregated public schools as unconstitutional and promote equality under the law.
In Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court displayed judicial restraint by upholding racially segregated public facilities on the basis of "separate but equal," while in Brown v. Board of Education, the Court exhibited judicial activism by overturning this precedent and mandating the desegregation of public schools.
